On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 11:28:40 +0530 Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agra...@nxp.com> wrote:
> This patch removes the dual keyword from dual license > definitions to avoid confusion. As the *dual* word is > not required to be added SPDX license. > > Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agra...@nxp.com> > --- > license/exceptions.txt | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/license/exceptions.txt b/license/exceptions.txt > index c984764a0..3afb996ed 100644 > --- a/license/exceptions.txt > +++ b/license/exceptions.txt > @@ -5,8 +5,8 @@ IP License policy as defined in DPDK Charter available at: > > Note that following licenses are not exceptions:- > - BSD-3-Clause > - - Dual BSD-3-Clause OR GPL-2.0 > - - Dual BSD-3-Clause OR LGPL-2.1 > + - BSD-3-Clause OR GPL-2.0 > + - BSD-3-Clause OR LGPL-2.1 > - GPL-2.0 (*Only for kernel code*) > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Makes sense to me, but probably needs Board legal approval
