Hi Akhil,

@Akhil: Is there a chance getting this change into 20.11?

Any more comments or anyone see any potential issues with this approach?

Regards,
Arek

-----Original Message-----
From: Doherty, Declan <[email protected]> 
Sent: piÄ…tek, 31 lipca 2020 16:34
To: Kusztal, ArkadiuszX <[email protected]>; [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]; Trahe, Fiona <[email protected]>; 
[email protected]; [email protected]; Zhang, Roy Fan 
<[email protected]>; Ananyev, Konstantin <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] cryptodev: move AES-GMAC to aead algorithms

On 29/07/2020 3:22 PM, Arek Kusztal wrote:
> This is proposal to move AES-GMAC algorithm to AEAD set of algorithms. 
> It is however not 100% conformant GMAC as instead of aad pointer data 
> to be authenticated is passed normally and  aead.data.length field is 
> used to specify length of data to be authenticated.
> Reason behind this move is that GMAC is variant of GCM so it may 
> simplify implementations that are using these algorithms (mainly IPsec).
> AES-GMAC therefore needs to be removed from auth algorithms.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arek Kusztal <[email protected]>
> ---
..
> 

I think  this makes sense in light of how AES-GMAC support is specified in the 
IPsec GMAC rfc (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4543)

Acked-by: Declan Doherty <[email protected]>

Reply via email to