On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 12:20:28PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Fri, 14 Aug 2020 22:09:11 +0300 > Dmitry Kozlyuk <dmitry.kozl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, 14 Aug 2020 11:45:49 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > > On Fri, 14 Aug 2020 21:39:29 +0300 > > > Dmitry Kozlyuk <dmitry.kozl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > [...] > > > FreeBsd doesn't go through the same log code. > > > > Then --log-timestamp shouldn't appear on FreeBSD if it's unsupported. > > Was using same ifdef that is already there. There are several options already > (like syslog facility) which do nothing on FreeBSD anyway. > While that is correct, I think that we really should support this on FreeBSD also, since I don't think there is any technical reason we can't do so, right? Even a sub-optimal solution where the timestamp write and log write are non-atomic would be better than nothing.
/Bruce