> -----Original Message-----
> From: Guo, Jia <[email protected]>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2020 11:59 AM
> To: Zhang, Qi Z <[email protected]>; Yang, Qiming
> <[email protected]>
> Cc: Xu, Ting <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Zhang, Qi Z
> <[email protected]>; [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/ice/base: fix wrong outer ipv6 ptype table
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: dev <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Qi Zhang
> > Sent: Sunday, September 6, 2020 9:02 PM
> > To: Yang, Qiming <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Xu, Ting <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Zhang, Qi Z
> > <[email protected]>; [email protected]
> > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/ice/base: fix wrong outer ipv6 ptype
> > table
> >
> > ptype 264, 265, 266, 267, 275 is should not be set in
> ice_ptypes_ipv6_ofos_all.
> >
>
> A tiny comment, "is" should be deleted, right?
yes
> And I think ptype name is more
> readable than number when interpret the reason, you choose.
> After that patch is ok.
These ptypes are reserved, they have no name.
>
> Acked-by: Jeff Guo <[email protected]>
Applied to dpdk-next-net-intel after correct the commit log.
Thanks
Qi
