Ok, thanks Jiayu, but I don't know before which "}" whitespace should be
inserted, can you paste your check report here?
BTW, I used chekpatch.pl in Linux 5.5.9, it doesn't report this,I also tried
checkpatch.pl in Linus kernel git tree, the same result, so out of curiosity,
can you send me your checkpatch.pl? I can use it to check my patches later.
At 2020-09-27 09:49:37, "Hu, Jiayu" <jiayu...@intel.com> wrote:
>Hi Yi,
>
>Just a small issue, and please see it inline. After change it,
>you can add my ack in the serial patches.
>
>Thanks,
>Jiayu
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: yang_y...@163.com <yang_y...@163.com>
>> Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2020 4:58 PM
>> To: dev@dpdk.org
>> Cc: Hu, Jiayu <jiayu...@intel.com>; tho...@monjalon.net;
>> yangy...@inspur.com; yang_y...@163.com
>> Subject: [PATCH v7 2/3] gro: add VXLAN UDP/IPv4 GRO support
>>
>> From: Yi Yang <yangy...@inspur.com>
>>
>> VXLAN UDP/IPv4 GRO can help improve VM-to-VM UDP
>> performance when UFO or GSO is enabled in VM, GRO
>> must be supported if UFO or GSO is enabled,
>> otherwise, performance can't get big improvement
>> if only GSO is there.
>>
>> With this enabled in DPDK, OVS DPDK can leverage it
>> to improve VM-to-VM UDP performance, it will reassemble
>> VXLAN UDP/IPv4 fragments immediate after they are
>> received from a physical NIC. It is very helpful in
>> OVS DPDK VXLAN use case.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yi Yang <yangy...@inspur.com>
>> diff --git a/lib/librte_gro/rte_gro.c b/lib/librte_gro/rte_gro.c
>> index ac23df1..e56bd20 100644
>> --- a/lib/librte_gro/rte_gro.c
>> +++ b/lib/librte_gro/rte_gro.c
>> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
>> #include "gro_tcp4.h"
>> #include "gro_udp4.h"
>> #include "gro_vxlan_tcp4.h"
>> +#include "gro_vxlan_udp4.h"
>>
>> typedef void *(*gro_tbl_create_fn)(uint16_t socket_id,
>> uint16_t max_flow_num,
>> @@ -20,14 +21,14 @@
>>
>> static gro_tbl_create_fn tbl_create_fn[RTE_GRO_TYPE_MAX_NUM] = {
>> gro_tcp4_tbl_create, gro_vxlan_tcp4_tbl_create,
>> - gro_udp4_tbl_create, NULL};
>> + gro_udp4_tbl_create, gro_vxlan_udp4_tbl_create, NULL};
>> static gro_tbl_destroy_fn tbl_destroy_fn[RTE_GRO_TYPE_MAX_NUM] = {
>> gro_tcp4_tbl_destroy, gro_vxlan_tcp4_tbl_destroy,
>> - gro_udp4_tbl_destroy,
>> + gro_udp4_tbl_destroy, gro_vxlan_udp4_tbl_destroy,
>> NULL};
>> static gro_tbl_pkt_count_fn tbl_pkt_count_fn[RTE_GRO_TYPE_MAX_NUM] =
>> {
>> gro_tcp4_tbl_pkt_count,
>> gro_vxlan_tcp4_tbl_pkt_count,
>> - gro_udp4_tbl_pkt_count,
>> + gro_udp4_tbl_pkt_count,
>> gro_vxlan_udp4_tbl_pkt_count,
>> NULL};
>>
>> #define IS_IPV4_TCP_PKT(ptype) (RTE_ETH_IS_IPV4_HDR(ptype) && \
>> @@ -47,6 +48,16 @@
>> RTE_PTYPE_INNER_L3_IPV4_EXT | \
>> RTE_PTYPE_INNER_L3_IPV4_EXT_UNKNOWN)) != 0))
>>
>> +#define IS_IPV4_VXLAN_UDP4_PKT(ptype) (RTE_ETH_IS_IPV4_HDR(ptype)
>> && \
>> + ((ptype & RTE_PTYPE_L4_UDP) == RTE_PTYPE_L4_UDP) && \
>> + ((ptype & RTE_PTYPE_TUNNEL_VXLAN) == \
>> + RTE_PTYPE_TUNNEL_VXLAN) && \
>> + ((ptype & RTE_PTYPE_INNER_L4_UDP) == \
>> + RTE_PTYPE_INNER_L4_UDP) && \
>> + (((ptype & RTE_PTYPE_INNER_L3_MASK) & \
>> + (RTE_PTYPE_INNER_L3_IPV4 | \
>> + RTE_PTYPE_INNER_L3_IPV4_EXT | \
>> + RTE_PTYPE_INNER_L3_IPV4_EXT_UNKNOWN)) != 0))
>>
>> /*
>> * GRO context structure. It keeps the table structures, which are
>> @@ -137,19 +148,27 @@ struct gro_ctx {
>> struct gro_udp4_item udp_items[RTE_GRO_MAX_BURST_ITEM_NUM]
>> = {{0} };
>>
>> /* Allocate a reassembly table for VXLAN TCP GRO */
>> - struct gro_vxlan_tcp4_tbl vxlan_tbl;
>> - struct gro_vxlan_tcp4_flow
>> vxlan_flows[RTE_GRO_MAX_BURST_ITEM_NUM];
>> - struct gro_vxlan_tcp4_item
>> vxlan_items[RTE_GRO_MAX_BURST_ITEM_NUM]
>> + struct gro_vxlan_tcp4_tbl vxlan_tcp_tbl;
>> + struct gro_vxlan_tcp4_flow
>> vxlan_tcp_flows[RTE_GRO_MAX_BURST_ITEM_NUM];
>> + struct gro_vxlan_tcp4_item
>> vxlan_tcp_items[RTE_GRO_MAX_BURST_ITEM_NUM]
>> = {{{0}, 0, 0} };
>>
>> + /* Allocate a reassembly table for VXLAN UDP GRO */
>> + struct gro_vxlan_udp4_tbl vxlan_udp_tbl;
>> + struct gro_vxlan_udp4_flow
>> vxlan_udp_flows[RTE_GRO_MAX_BURST_ITEM_NUM];
>> + struct gro_vxlan_udp4_item
>> vxlan_udp_items[RTE_GRO_MAX_BURST_ITEM_NUM]
>> + = {{{0}} };
>
>It seems you need add a space after the "}", and this is found by checkpatch.
>
>> +
>> struct rte_mbuf *unprocess_pkts[nb_pkts];
>> uint32_t item_num;
>> int32_t ret;
>> uint16_t i, unprocess_num = 0, nb_after_gro = nb_pkts;
>> - uint8_t do_tcp4_gro = 0, do_vxlan_gro = 0, do_udp4_gro = 0;
>> + uint8_t do_tcp4_gro = 0, do_vxlan_tcp_gro = 0, do_udp4_gro = 0,
>> + do_vxlan_udp_gro = 0;
>>
>> if (unlikely((param->gro_types & (RTE_GRO_IPV4_VXLAN_TCP_IPV4 |
>> RTE_GRO_TCP_IPV4 |
>> + RTE_GRO_IPV4_VXLAN_UDP_IPV4 |
>> RTE_GRO_UDP_IPV4)) == 0))
>> return nb_pkts;
>>
>> @@ -160,15 +179,28 @@ struct gro_ctx {
>>
>> if (param->gro_types & RTE_GRO_IPV4_VXLAN_TCP_IPV4) {
>> for (i = 0; i < item_num; i++)
>> - vxlan_flows[i].start_index = INVALID_ARRAY_INDEX;
>> -
>> - vxlan_tbl.flows = vxlan_flows;
>> - vxlan_tbl.items = vxlan_items;
>> - vxlan_tbl.flow_num = 0;
>> - vxlan_tbl.item_num = 0;
>> - vxlan_tbl.max_flow_num = item_num;
>> - vxlan_tbl.max_item_num = item_num;
>> - do_vxlan_gro = 1;
>> + vxlan_tcp_flows[i].start_index =
>> INVALID_ARRAY_INDEX;
>> +
>> + vxlan_tcp_tbl.flows = vxlan_tcp_flows;
>> + vxlan_tcp_tbl.items = vxlan_tcp_items;
>> + vxlan_tcp_tbl.flow_num = 0;
>> + vxlan_tcp_tbl.item_num = 0;
>> + vxlan_tcp_tbl.max_flow_num = item_num;
>> + vxlan_tcp_tbl.max_item_num = item_num;
>> + do_vxlan_tcp_gro = 1;
>> + }
>> +
