Hi, > -----Original Message----- > From: Thomas Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net> > Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2020 15:29 > To: Xu, Rosen <rosen...@intel.com> > Cc: Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zh...@intel.com>; Wang, Xiao W > <xiao.w.w...@intel.com>; Yang, Qiming <qiming.y...@intel.com>; Yigit, > Ferruh <ferruh.yi...@intel.com>; Richardson, Bruce > <bruce.richard...@intel.com>; Andrew Rybchenko > <arybche...@solarflare.com>; Wang, Zhihong <zhihong.w...@intel.com>; > Xing, Beilei <beilei.x...@intel.com>; Wu, Jingjing <jingjing...@intel.com>; > dev@dpdk.org; Zhao1, Wei <wei.zh...@intel.com>; Guo, Jia > <jia....@intel.com>; Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yi...@intel.com> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] CALL to eth PMD maintainers: complete closing of > port > > 22/09/2020 05:04, Xu, Rosen: > > Hi Thomas, > > > > Ipn3ke is based on ifpga_bus, and all ethdevs created from ipn3ke are > representors. > > So it's no need to add RTE_ETH_DEV_CLOSE_REMOVE flags into ipn3ke > driver. > > I don't understand how it is related. > Do you mean it will work fine with the new close behaviour?
yes
