> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Marchand <david.march...@redhat.com>
> Sent: Friday, October 2, 2020 9:29 AM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Dumitrescu, Cristian <cristian.dumitre...@intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] pipeline: fix build with glibc < 2.26
> 
> reallocarray has been introduced in glibc 2.26 but we still support
> glibc >= 2.7.
> Simply replace with realloc, as the considered sizes are unlikely to
> overflow.
> 
> """
> The reallocarray() function changes the size of the memory block
> pointed to by ptr to be large enough for an array of nmemb elements,
> each of which is size bytes.  It is equivalent to the call
> 
>        realloc(ptr, nmemb * size);
> 
> However, unlike that realloc() call, reallocarray() fails safely in
> the case where the multiplication would overflow.  If such an over‐
> flow occurs, reallocarray() returns NULL, sets errno to ENOMEM, and
> leaves the original block of memory unchanged.
> """
> 
> Fixes: 3ca60ceed79a ("pipeline: add SWX pipeline specification file")
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Marchand <david.march...@redhat.com>
> ---
>  lib/librte_pipeline/rte_swx_pipeline_spec.c | 25 +++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/librte_pipeline/rte_swx_pipeline_spec.c
> b/lib/librte_pipeline/rte_swx_pipeline_spec.c
> index d72badd03d..95de8f983d 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_pipeline/rte_swx_pipeline_spec.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_pipeline/rte_swx_pipeline_spec.c
> @@ -213,9 +213,8 @@ struct_block_parse(struct struct_spec *s,
>               return -ENOMEM;
>       }
> 
> -     new_fields = reallocarray(s->fields,
> -                               s->n_fields + 1,
> -                               sizeof(struct rte_swx_field_params));
> +     new_fields = realloc(s->fields,
> +                          (s->n_fields + 1) * sizeof(struct
> rte_swx_field_params));
>       if (!new_fields) {
>               free(name);
> 
> @@ -452,9 +451,8 @@ action_block_parse(struct action_spec *s,
>               return -ENOMEM;
>       }
> 
> -     new_instructions = reallocarray(s->instructions,
> -                                     s->n_instructions + 1,
> -                                     sizeof(char *));
> +     new_instructions = realloc(s->instructions,
> +                                (s->n_instructions + 1) * sizeof(char *));
>       if (!new_instructions) {
>               free(instr);
> 
> @@ -620,9 +618,8 @@ table_key_block_parse(struct table_spec *s,
>               return -ENOMEM;
>       }
> 
> -     new_fields = reallocarray(s->params.fields,
> -                               s->params.n_fields + 1,
> -                               sizeof(struct
> rte_swx_match_field_params));
> +     new_fields = realloc(s->params.fields,
> +                          (s->params.n_fields + 1) * sizeof(struct
> rte_swx_match_field_params));
>       if (!new_fields) {
>               free(name);
> 
> @@ -700,9 +697,8 @@ table_actions_block_parse(struct table_spec *s,
>               return -ENOMEM;
>       }
> 
> -     new_action_names = reallocarray(s->params.action_names,
> -                                     s->params.n_actions + 1,
> -                                     sizeof(char *));
> +     new_action_names = realloc(s->params.action_names,
> +                                (s->params.n_actions + 1) * sizeof(char *));
>       if (!new_action_names) {
>               free(name);
> 
> @@ -1019,9 +1015,8 @@ apply_block_parse(struct apply_spec *s,
>               return -ENOMEM;
>       }
> 
> -     new_instructions = reallocarray(s->instructions,
> -                                     s->n_instructions + 1,
> -                                     sizeof(char *));
> +     new_instructions = realloc(s->instructions,
> +                                (s->n_instructions + 1) * sizeof(char *));
>       if (!new_instructions) {
>               free(instr);
> 
> --
> 2.23.0


Acked-by: Cristian Dumitrescu <cristian.dumitre...@intel.com>

Reply via email to