rte_ring_create() needs a socket-id though and seems to be allocating core-specific memory pools for the ring ? But my non-EAL app thread is not bound to any core, so now I am wondering if that will work.
Rgds, Gopa. On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Gopakumar Choorakkot Edakkunni <gopakumar.c.e at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I have a requirement where one of my non-EAL app threads needs to > handoff some packets to an EAL task. I was thinking of using > rte_ring_mp_enqueue/dequeue for that purpose. I looked at the code for > the rte_ring library and it doesnt look like it has any "EAL" > dependencies, but I wanted to double confirm that there are no issues > in using it that way. Dint find much yes/no info about that on the > mailers/docs. Pls let me know your thoughts. > > Rgds, > Gopa.
