Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 02/11] ethdev: add IPv6 fragment extension header item

[Dekel Peled]

Yes, thanks.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net>
> Sent: Monday, October 12, 2020 11:50 PM
> To: Dekel Peled <dek...@nvidia.com>
> Cc: Ori Kam <or...@nvidia.com>; ferruh.yi...@intel.com;
> arybche...@solarflare.com; konstantin.anan...@intel.com;
> olivier.m...@6wind.com; wenzhuo...@intel.com; beilei.x...@intel.com;
> bernard.iremon...@intel.com; Matan Azrad <ma...@nvidia.com>; Shahaf
> Shuler <shah...@nvidia.com>; Slava Ovsiienko <viachesl...@nvidia.com>;
> dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 02/11] ethdev: add IPv6 fragment
> extension header item
> 
> 12/10/2020 12:43, Dekel Peled:
> > --- a/lib/librte_ip_frag/rte_ip_frag.h
> > +++ b/lib/librte_ip_frag/rte_ip_frag.h
> > +/* struct ipv6_extension_fragment moved to librte_net/rte_ip.h and
> renamed. */
> > +#define ipv6_extension_fragment    rte_ipv6_fragment_ext
> 
> This struct name did not have rte_ prefix, so I suggest deprecating it during
> next year.
> Please Dekel, could you propose a deprecation notice later?
>