> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Rix <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, October 26, 2020 6:56 AM
> To: Chautru, Nicolas <[email protected]>; [email protected];
> [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 7/7] app/bbdev: update offload test to dequeue full
> ring
>
>
> On 10/23/20 4:43 PM, Nicolas Chautru wrote:
> > update offload dequeue to retrieve the full ring to be agnostic of
> > implementation.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Chautru <[email protected]>
> > Acked-by: Aidan Goddard <[email protected]>
> > Acked-by: Dave Burley <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c | 16 ++++++++--------
> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
> > b/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
> > index b5dc536..a6884c5 100644
> > --- a/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
> > +++ b/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
> > @@ -4463,8 +4463,8 @@ typedef int (test_case_function)(struct
> active_device *ad,
> > /* Dequeue one operation */
> This comment and similar need to change, not doing just 1 anymore
We still just need one operation dequeued to be considered done.
> > do {
> > deq += rte_bbdev_dequeue_dec_ops(dev_id,
> queue_id,
> > - &ops_deq[deq], 1);
> > - } while (unlikely(deq != 1));
> > + &ops_deq[deq], enq);
> > + } while (unlikely(deq == 0));
>
> This check looks wrong, should likely be (deq != enq)
>
> Similar below
No that is intentional. Not waiting for everything to be done but purely the
first dequeue. If not this would be run multiple times.
The rest of ring is dequeued below.
>
> Tom
>
> >
> > deq_last_time = rte_rdtsc_precise() - deq_start_time;
> > time_st->deq_max_time = RTE_MAX(time_st-
> >deq_max_time, @@ -4554,8
> > +4554,8 @@ typedef int (test_case_function)(struct active_device *ad,
> > /* Dequeue one operation */
> > do {
> > deq += rte_bbdev_dequeue_ldpc_dec_ops(dev_id,
> queue_id,
> > - &ops_deq[deq], 1);
> > - } while (unlikely(deq != 1));
> > + &ops_deq[deq], enq);
> > + } while (unlikely(deq == 0));
> >
> > deq_last_time = rte_rdtsc_precise() - deq_start_time;
> > time_st->deq_max_time = RTE_MAX(time_st-
> >deq_max_time, @@ -4642,8
> > +4642,8 @@ typedef int (test_case_function)(struct active_device *ad,
> > /* Dequeue one operation */
> > do {
> > deq += rte_bbdev_dequeue_enc_ops(dev_id,
> queue_id,
> > - &ops_deq[deq], 1);
> > - } while (unlikely(deq != 1));
> > + &ops_deq[deq], enq);
> > + } while (unlikely(deq == 0));
> >
> > deq_last_time = rte_rdtsc_precise() - deq_start_time;
> > time_st->deq_max_time = RTE_MAX(time_st-
> >deq_max_time, @@ -4725,8
> > +4725,8 @@ typedef int (test_case_function)(struct active_device *ad,
> > /* Dequeue one operation */
> > do {
> > deq += rte_bbdev_dequeue_ldpc_enc_ops(dev_id,
> queue_id,
> > - &ops_deq[deq], 1);
> > - } while (unlikely(deq != 1));
> > + &ops_deq[deq], enq);
> > + } while (unlikely(deq == 0));
> >
> > deq_last_time = rte_rdtsc_precise() - deq_start_time;
> > time_st->deq_max_time = RTE_MAX(time_st-
> >deq_max_time,
