On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 7:05 PM Liang, Ma <liang.j...@intel.com> wrote: > > Hi Thomas, > I think I addressed all of the questions in relation to V9. I don't think I > can solve the issue of a generic API on my own. From the Community Call last > week Jerin also said that a generic was investigated but that a single > solution wasn't feasible.
I think, From the architecture point of view, the specific functionally of UMONITOR may not be abstracted. But from the ethdev callback point of view, Can it be abstracted in such a way that packet notification available through checking interrupt status register or ring descriptor location, etc by the driver. Use that callback as a notification mechanism rather than defining a memory-based scheme that UMONITOR expects? or similar thoughts on abstraction. > This API is experimental and other vendor support can be added as needed. If > there are any other open issue let me know? > > Regards > Liang > > On 27 Oct 17:02, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > Please be more patient. > > I asked some questions on v9 (ethdev API is not generic enough), > > and you send a v10 in the same minute you reply, > > without making sure I agree with your answers. > > > > > >
