> -----Original Message----- > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com] > Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 2:24 PM > To: Mcnamara, John > Cc: Sanford, Robert; Richardson, Bruce; dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: Ethernet API - multiple post-RX-burst callbacks' run-order is > opposite to their add-order
Hi Thomas, > > Don't hesitate to use Suggested-by: to give credits. I wasn't aware of that. I'll use it in future. > > If the patch is accepted I'll add a note to the release notes also. > > Why not doing the release notes change atomicly in the same patch? Mainly, because there isn't currently a clear place to do that in the release notes. I could change the "New Features" section to "New Features in 2.0" and then add a "New Features in 2.1". Or perhaps this needs to go into a "Changed Features in 2.1" section. If you have a suggestion I'll follow it. And I support your previous suggestion of updating the release notes in patchsets. That would make things easier for the release notes maintainers (me and you mainly). Perhaps I'll kick off a separate thread of discussion on refactoring the release notes to make them more useful and easier to update. John. --
