On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 12:29:53AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 2015-07-11 01:18, Pablo de Lara: > > The main change when creating a new table is that the number of entries > > per bucket is fixed now, so its parameter is ignored now > > (still there to maintain the same parameters structure). > > Why not rename the "bucket_entries" field to "reserved"? > The API of this field has changed (now ignored) so it should be reflected > without changing the ABI.
Since the hash_create function is itself already versionned to take account of the new struct parameter, there is no reason to keep the field at all, as far as I can see. We can just drop it, and let the ABI versionning handle the change. /Bruce