On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 05:32:26PM +0100, Olivier Matz wrote:
> Hi Bruce,
>
> Thanks for the feedback.
>
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 03:28:46PM +0000, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 03:20:42PM +0100, Olivier Matz wrote:
> > > When dpdk is compiled as static libraries, it is not possible
> > > to load a plugin from an application. We get the following error:
> > >
> > > EAL: librte_pmd_xxxx.so: undefined symbol: per_lcore__rte_errno
> > >
> > > This happens because the dpdk symbols are not exported. Add them to the
> > > dynamic symbol table by using '-Wl,--export-dynamic'. This option was
> > > previously present when compiled with Makefiles, it was introduced in
> > > commit f9a08f650211 ("eal: add support for shared object drivers")
> > >
> > > Fixes: 16ade738fd0d ("app/testpmd: build with meson")
> > > Fixes: 89f0711f9ddf ("examples: build some samples with meson")
> > > Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Olivier Matz <olivier.m...@6wind.com>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Maybe the patch can be improved: I suppose that --export-dynamic
> > > should only be added in case we are linking in static mode. Any
> > > help about how to do that is welcome.
> >
> > get_option('default_library') == 'static'
> >
> > However, if the flag is harmless in shared linking mode, I don't think we
> > need bother with this.
>
> ok
>
> > >
> > > There is probably a better place to define the default ldflags for
> > > all applications (to factorize between app and example).
> > >
> > > Also, should this flag be advertised in pkg-config?
> > >
> > Perhaps. However, I'm not sure how common it would be for people to static
> > link their own apps with DPDK and then want to plug in extra drivers after
> > the fact? Are there any possible negative impacts to making that change?
>
> I don't know if it is common, but this is something we do :)
>
> > If we weren't right before the release deadline I'd definitely suggest
> > adding it to the pkg-config files. At this late stage in release, I'm more
> > cautious.
>
> Yes, it is too late for 20.11. Maybe even for this patch without
> updating pkg-config.
>
Well, since this is something clearly broken that is of use to you, I think
we should strive to get some fix for it in. Based on the lateness of the
hour, I think your patch is pretty close to the least-risky option we could
take here. Therefore, despite my previous comment about not needing to
limit the additional linking flag to static-builds only, I would suggest -
out of an abundance of caution - that we do so, and keep the rest of your
patch as-is for 20.11. Thereafter we can look at other possible approaches
and simplifications in 21.02 and backport them.
So, for your patch with "if get_option('default_library') ..." checks added
appropriately:
Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richard...@intel.com>
