> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yan, Zhirun <zhirun....@intel.com>
> Sent: Monday, December 21, 2020 2:52 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org; Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zh...@intel.com>; Cao, Yahui 
> <yahui....@intel.com>; Wang, Xiao W <xiao.w.w...@intel.com>;
> Guo, Junfeng <junfeng....@intel.com>
> Cc: Su, Simei <simei...@intel.com>; Xu, Ting <ting...@intel.com>; Zhang, 
> Yuying <yuying.zh...@intel.com>; Yan, Zhirun
> <zhirun....@intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v1 3/5] net/ice: add outer input set mask to distinguish 
> outer fields
> 
> Add 64-bit input_set_mask_f for outer input set. input_set_mask_f is
> used for inner fields or non-tunnel fields. Adjust indentation of
> ice_pattern_match_item list in switch, RSS and FDIR for easy
> review. For fields in tunnel layer, like GTPU TEID, put them in
> outer part.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zhirun Yan <zhirun....@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ice/ice_fdir_filter.c   | 110 ++++-----
>  drivers/net/ice/ice_generic_flow.h  |   1 +
>  drivers/net/ice/ice_hash.c          | 192 ++++++---------
>  drivers/net/ice/ice_switch_filter.c | 348 ++++++++++------------------
>  4 files changed, 231 insertions(+), 420 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ice/ice_fdir_filter.c 
> b/drivers/net/ice/ice_fdir_filter.c
> index 1f2576a444..76e0a8df38 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ice/ice_fdir_filter.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ice/ice_fdir_filter.c
> @@ -55,92 +55,74 @@
> 

...
> +     {pattern_eth_ipv4,                              ICE_INSET_NONE,         
>         ICE_FDIR_INSET_ETH_IPV4,        ICE_INSET_NONE},
> +     {pattern_eth_ipv4_udp,                          ICE_INSET_NONE, 
> ICE_FDIR_INSET_ETH_IPV4_UDP,            ICE_INSET_NONE},
> +     {pattern_eth_ipv4_tcp,                          ICE_INSET_NONE,         
>         ICE_FDIR_INSET_ETH_IPV4_TCP,    ICE_INSET_NONE},
> +     {pattern_eth_ipv4_sctp,                         ICE_INSET_NONE,         
> ICE_FDIR_INSET_ETH_IPV4_SCTP,           ICE_INSET_NONE},
> +     {pattern_eth_ipv6,                              ICE_INSET_NONE,         
>         ICE_FDIR_INSET_ETH_IPV6,        ICE_INSET_NONE},
> +     {pattern_eth_ipv6_udp,                          ICE_INSET_NONE,         
> ICE_FDIR_INSET_ETH_IPV6_UDP,            ICE_INSET_NONE},
> +     {pattern_eth_ipv6_tcp,                          ICE_INSET_NONE,         
>         ICE_FDIR_INSET_ETH_IPV6_TCP,    ICE_INSET_NONE},
> +     {pattern_eth_ipv6_sctp,                         ICE_INSET_NONE,         
> ICE_FDIR_INSET_ETH_IPV6_SCTP,           ICE_INSET_NONE},
> +     {pattern_eth_ipv4_udp_vxlan_ipv4,               ICE_INSET_NONE,         
>         ICE_FDIR_INSET_VXLAN_IPV4_L,    ICE_INSET_NONE},
> +     {pattern_eth_ipv4_udp_vxlan_ipv4_udp,           ICE_INSET_NONE,         
> ICE_FDIR_INSET_VXLAN_IPV4_UDP_L,        ICE_INSET_NONE},
> +     {pattern_eth_ipv4_udp_vxlan_ipv4_tcp,           ICE_INSET_NONE,         
> ICE_FDIR_INSET_VXLAN_IPV4_TCP_L,        ICE_INSET_NONE},
> +     {pattern_eth_ipv4_udp_vxlan_ipv4_sctp,          ICE_INSET_NONE,         
> ICE_FDIR_INSET_VXLAN_IPV4_SCTP_L,       ICE_INSET_NONE},
> +     {pattern_eth_ipv4_udp_vxlan_eth_ipv4,           ICE_INSET_NONE,         
>         ICE_FDIR_INSET_VXLAN_IPV4_L,            ICE_INSET_NONE},
> +     {pattern_eth_ipv4_udp_vxlan_eth_ipv4_udp,       ICE_INSET_NONE,         
>         ICE_FDIR_INSET_VXLAN_IPV4_UDP_L,        ICE_INSET_NONE},
> +     {pattern_eth_ipv4_udp_vxlan_eth_ipv4_tcp,       ICE_INSET_NONE,         
>         ICE_FDIR_INSET_VXLAN_IPV4_TCP_L,        ICE_INSET_NONE},
> +     {pattern_eth_ipv4_udp_vxlan_eth_ipv4_sctp,      ICE_INSET_NONE,         
>         ICE_FDIR_INSET_VXLAN_IPV4_SCTP_L,       ICE_INSET_NONE},
>  };
> 

[Cao, Yahui] Why is the mask put in the 3rd column instead of 2nd column ? I 
prefer the way that 2nd column is for outer field and 3rd column is for inner 
field.
> 
>  static int
> --
> 2.25.1

Reply via email to