Hi Ashish,
On Tue, Dec 29, 2020 at 01:22:04PM -0700, Ashish Sadanandan wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
> Should I reference the commit that created rte_mbuf_dyn.h for the Fixes tag?
Yes, it should reference the patch that introduced the issue. In this case,
it should be:
Fixes: 4958ca3a443a ("mbuf: support dynamic fields and flags")
Can you please also change the title to start with "fix", for
instance like this:
mbuf: fix inclusion from c++
You can also add "Cc: [email protected]" in the commit log.
Some documentation can be found in doc/guides/contributing/patches.rst
Thanks,
Olivier
> PS: this is my first time submitting a patch to DPDK, so forgive me if this
> is covered in the contributing doc, but I couldn't find anything that
> applied to this situation
>
> On Tue, Dec 29, 2020 at 1:10 PM Stephen Hemminger <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 29 Dec 2020 12:41:44 -0700
> > Ashish Sadanandan <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > The header was missing the extern "C" directive which causes name
> > > mangling of functions by C++ compilers, leading to linker errors
> > > complaining of undefined references to these functions.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Ashish Sadanandan <[email protected]>
> >
> > Could you add a Fixes tag please?
> >
