Hi Kevin, > -----Original Message----- > From: Kevin Traynor <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2021 6:55 PM > To: Ali Alnubani <[email protected]>; [email protected] > Cc: [email protected]; Abhishek Marathe <[email protected]>; > Akhil Goyal <[email protected]>; [email protected]; David > Christensen <[email protected]>; Hemant Agrawal > <[email protected]>; Ian Stokes <[email protected]>; Jerin > Jacob <[email protected]>; John McNamara <[email protected]>; > Ju-Hyoung Lee <[email protected]>; Luca Boccassi <[email protected]>; > Pei Zhang <[email protected]>; [email protected]; > [email protected]; Raslan Darawsheh <[email protected]>; NBU- > Contact-Thomas Monjalon <[email protected]>; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected]; Slava > Ovsiienko <[email protected]>; Asaf Penso <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] 18.11.11 (LTS) patches review and test > > On 14/01/2021 15:11, Ali Alnubani wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Hi Ali, > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: stable <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Kevin Traynor > >> Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2020 2:03 PM > >> To: [email protected] > >> Cc: [email protected]; Abhishek Marathe > <[email protected]>; > >> Akhil Goyal <[email protected]>; Ali Alnubani > >> <[email protected]>; [email protected]; David Christensen > >> <[email protected]>; Hemant Agrawal > <[email protected]>; > >> Ian Stokes <[email protected]>; Jerin Jacob <[email protected]>; > >> John McNamara <[email protected]>; Ju-Hyoung Lee > >> <[email protected]>; Kevin Traynor <[email protected]>; Luca > >> Boccassi <[email protected]>; Pei Zhang <[email protected]>; > >> [email protected]; [email protected]; Raslan Darawsheh > >> <[email protected]>; NBU- Contact-Thomas Monjalon > >> <[email protected]>; [email protected]; > [email protected]; > >> [email protected] > >> Subject: [dpdk-stable] 18.11.11 (LTS) patches review and test > >> > >> Hi all, > >> > >> Here is a list of patches targeted for LTS release 18.11.11. > >> > >> The planned date for the final release is 19th January. > >> > >> Note, this is the last planned release of 18.11 LTS, and it will be > >> unmaintained after this release, so I encourage anyone who is using > >> 18.11 LTS to test. > >> > >> Please help with testing and validation of your use cases and report > >> any issues/results with reply-all to this mail. For the final release > >> the fixes and reported validations will be added to the release notes. > >> > > > > The following covers the functional tests that we ran on Mellanox > hardware for this release: > > - Basic functionality: > > Send and receive multiple types of traffic. > > - testpmd xstats counter tests. > > - testpmd timestamp tests. > > - Changing/checking link status through testpmd. > > - RTE flow and flow_director tests. > > - Some RSS tests. > > - VLAN stripping and insertion tests. > > - Checksum and TSO tests. > > - ptype tests. > > - l3fwd-power example application tests. > > - Multi-process example applications tests. > > > > Functional tests ran on: > > - NIC: ConnectX-4 Lx / OS: RHEL7.4 / Driver: > > MLNX_OFED_LINUX-5.2-1.0.4.0 / Firmware: 14.29.1016 > > - NIC: ConnectX-5 / OS: RHEL7.4 / Driver: MLNX_OFED_LINUX-5.2-1.0.4.0 > > / Firmware: 16.29.1016 > > > > Thanks for your testing. > > > We don't see any issues introduced by the new changes in this release, > however, we found the following issues while testing due to environment > changes: > > - Bug 615 - testpmd gets stuck when deleting an FDIR flow - > https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbugs > .dpdk.org%2Fshow_bug.cgi%3Fid%3D615&data=04%7C01%7Calialnu%4 > 0nvidia.com%7C0697f1840c024f99d82908d8b8ad45a0%7C43083d15727340c1b > 7db39efd9ccc17a%7C0%7C0%7C637462401681676672%7CUnknown%7CTWFp > bGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVC > I6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=4DWeo1yuZd7Y1%2BgfkX4vkTQGkrqtYLPFR > 4KBTb2J5Us%3D&reserved=0 - Won't fix. > > - Bug 616 - [mlx5] packet does not match a corresponding rte_flow rule due > to inner ether_type spec validation - > https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbugs > .dpdk.org%2Fshow_bug.cgi%3Fid%3D616&data=04%7C01%7Calialnu%4 > 0nvidia.com%7C0697f1840c024f99d82908d8b8ad45a0%7C43083d15727340c1b > 7db39efd9ccc17a%7C0%7C0%7C637462401681686667%7CUnknown%7CTWFp > bGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVC > I6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=EzIwmXI5Fd9o2AA33sU26MNrYOBbgTugfh > Cm0gHFzEA%3D&reserved=0 - Won't fix. > > - Bug 617 - [mlx5] packet does not match a corresponding rte_flow rule due > to vxlan vni spec validation - > https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbugs > .dpdk.org%2Fshow_bug.cgi%3Fid%3D617&data=04%7C01%7Calialnu%4 > 0nvidia.com%7C0697f1840c024f99d82908d8b8ad45a0%7C43083d15727340c1b > 7db39efd9ccc17a%7C0%7C0%7C637462401681686667%7CUnknown%7CTWFp > bGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVC > I6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=dCdR2epT0kOoTXs%2B2hrOZeTBtMI8jVHP6 > uKYKtTzbkA%3D&reserved=0 - Won't fix. > > We can put these in the known issues section of the release notes. > > > - Bug 618 - [mlx5] secondary process fails to start - > https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbugs > .dpdk.org%2Fshow_bug.cgi%3Fid%3D618&data=04%7C01%7Calialnu%4 > 0nvidia.com%7C0697f1840c024f99d82908d8b8ad45a0%7C43083d15727340c1b > 7db39efd9ccc17a%7C0%7C0%7C637462401681686667%7CUnknown%7CTWFp > bGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVC > I6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=Akc9dviCGiCfqbuFJZLbsC8%2BU394q9jYOKr > fbOZlBXk%3D&reserved=0 - We are still looking into this. > > > > Ok, I'll keep an eye on the Bz and please add me on Cc: if there are patches > to fix it and I can run them through the 18.11 build checks etc. >
Ran all my tests again on latest (660b995) and didn't see any new issues. Thanks, Ali
