> -----Original Message-----
> From: Honnappa Nagarahalli <[email protected]>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 5, 2021 4:12 PM
> To: Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula <[email protected]>; Juraj Linkeš
> <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Ruifeng Wang
> <[email protected]>; Phil Yang <[email protected]>;
> [email protected]; Dharmik Thakkar <[email protected]>;
> [email protected]; [email protected]; Ajit Khaparde
> ([email protected]) <[email protected]>;
> [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]; nd <[email protected]>; nd <[email protected]>
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v14 00/12] Arm build options rework
> 
> <snip>
> 
> > >
> > >v14:
> > >Resent for retesting (because of suspected false negative).
> > >
> > >Series Acked-by: Jerin Jacob <[email protected]> Series Tested-by:
> > >Jerin Jacob <[email protected]> Series Tested-by: Dharmik Thakkar
> > ><[email protected]> Series Tested-by: Vimal Chungath
> > ><[email protected]>
> > >
> >
> > Series Tested-by: Pavan Nikhilesh <[email protected]>
> >
> > Also, I believe we need to take a look at ARCH_SOC_ID support coming
> > up in
> > 5.9 kernel.
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20200506164411.3284-1-
> > [email protected]/
> 
> Agree, it can come after this series is merged.
> 
> Note that it requires firmware with SMCCC v1.2 support in the underlying
> platform.
> 

I have a few questions to everyone:
Is there any comprehensive documentation about how to use this? Things like 
where in Linux can I get the ARCH_SOC_ID and how are the ID's mapped to socs?
If the ID mappings are not public then the plaform owners would need to add the 
support, right?

Reply via email to