Hi,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lu, Wenzhuo
> Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2015 8:26 AM
> To: De Lara Guarch, Pablo; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] testpmd: fix wrong variable type in
> ieee1588fwd for 32 bits
>
> Hi Pablo,
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Pablo de Lara
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2015 2:39 PM
> > To: dev at dpdk.org
> > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] testpmd: fix wrong variable type in
> ieee1588fwd for
> > 32 bits
> >
> > In ieee1588fwd.c, timestamp.tv_sec is a size_t variable, which is a long
> > int,
> but it
> I think you mean time_t :)
Yes, sorry! Will send a v2.
Thanks!
Pablo
>
> > was being printed with PRIu64, causing an issue on 32 bits.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pablo de Lara <pablo.de.lara.guarch at intel.com>
> > ---
> > app/test-pmd/ieee1588fwd.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/app/test-pmd/ieee1588fwd.c b/app/test-pmd/ieee1588fwd.c
> index
> > 069ee2e..b1a301b 100644
> > --- a/app/test-pmd/ieee1588fwd.c
> > +++ b/app/test-pmd/ieee1588fwd.c
> > @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ port_ieee1588_rx_timestamp_check(portid_t pi,
> uint32_t
> > index)
> > (unsigned) pi);
> > return;
> > }
> > - printf("Port %u RX timestamp value %"PRIu64"\n",
> > + printf("Port %u RX timestamp value %lu\n",
> > (unsigned) pi, timestamp.tv_sec); }
> >
> > @@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ port_ieee1588_tx_timestamp_check(portid_t pi)
> > (unsigned) pi, (unsigned)
> > MAX_TX_TMST_WAIT_MICROSECS);
> > return;
> > }
> > - printf("Port %u TX timestamp value %"PRIu64" validated after "
> > + printf("Port %u TX timestamp value %lu validated after "
> > "%u micro-second%s\n",
> > (unsigned) pi, timestamp.tv_sec, wait_us,
> > (wait_us == 1) ? "" : "s");
> > --
> > 2.4.2
