> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Xing, Beilei
> Sent: Tuesday, March 2, 2021 3:17 PM
> To: Li, Xiaoyun <[email protected]>; Guo, Jia <[email protected]>; Lu,
> Wenzhuo <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/i40e: fix IPv4 fragment offload issue
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Li, Xiaoyun <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 2, 2021 3:03 PM
> > To: Xing, Beilei <[email protected]>; Guo, Jia
> > <[email protected]>; Lu, Wenzhuo <[email protected]>
> > Cc: [email protected]; Li, Xiaoyun <[email protected]>; [email protected]
> > Subject: [PATCH v2] net/i40e: fix IPv4 fragment offload issue
> >
> > IPv4 fragment_offset mask was required to be 0 no matter what the spec
> > value was. But zero mask means not caring about fragment_offset field
> > then both non-frag and frag packets should hit the rule.
> >
> > But the actual fragment rules should be like the following:
> > Only non-fragment packets can hit Rule 1:
> > Rule 1: mask=0x3fff, spec=0
> > Only fragment packets can hit rule 2:
> > Rule 2: mask=0x3fff, spec=0x8, last=0x2000
> >
> > This patch allows the above rules.
> >
> > Fixes: 42044b69c67d ("net/i40e: support input set selection for FDIR")
> > Cc: [email protected]
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Xiaoyun Li <[email protected]>
> 
> Acked-by: Beilei Xing <[email protected]>

Applied to dpdk-next-net-intel.

Thanks
Qi

Reply via email to