在 2021/3/5 15:46, Li, Xiaoyun 写道:
Hi
Sorry, forgot to send this in last patchset.

-----Original Message-----
From: Lijun Ou <ouli...@huawei.com>
Sent: Friday, March 5, 2021 15:33
To: Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yi...@intel.com>
Cc: Li, Xiaoyun <xiaoyun...@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org;
linux...@openeuler.org
Subject: [PATCH] app/testpmd: support Tx mbuf free on demand cmd

From: Chengwen Feng <fengcheng...@huawei.com>

This patch support tx_done_cleanup command:
tx_done_cleanup port (port_id) (queue_id) (free_cnt)

User must make sure there are no concurrent access to the same Tx queue (like
rte_eth_tx_burst, rte_eth_dev_tx_queue_stop and so on) when this command
Users ...... this command is executed.
OK, I will fix.
executed.

Signed-off-by: Chengwen Feng <fengcheng...@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Lijun Ou <ouli...@huawei.com>
---
  app/test-pmd/cmdline.c                      | 91 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  doc/guides/rel_notes/release_21_05.rst      |  2 +
  doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst |  7 +++
  3 files changed, 100 insertions(+)

diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c index
14110eb..832ae70 100644
--- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
+++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
  #include <rte_pci.h>
  #include <rte_ether.h>
  #include <rte_ethdev.h>
+#include <rte_ethdev_driver.h>
  #include <rte_string_fns.h>
  #include <rte_devargs.h>
  #include <rte_flow.h>
@@ -675,6 +676,9 @@ static void cmd_help_long_parsed(void *parsed_result,
                        "set port (port_id) ptype_mask (ptype_mask)\n"
                        "    set packet types classification for a specific
port\n\n"

+                       "tx_done_cleanup (port_id) (queue_id) (free_cnt)\n"
+                       "    Cleanup a tx queue's mbuf on a port\n\n"
+
                        "set port (port_id) queue-region region_id (value) "
                        "queue_start_index (value) queue_num (value)\n"
                        "    Set a queue region on a port\n\n"
@@ -16910,6 +16914,92 @@ cmdline_parse_inst_t cmd_showport_macs = {
        },
  };

+/* *** tx_done_cleanup *** */
+struct cmd_tx_done_cleanup_result {
+       cmdline_fixed_string_t clean;
+       cmdline_fixed_string_t port;
+       uint16_t port_id;
+       uint16_t queue_id;
+       uint32_t free_cnt;
+};
+
+static void
+cmd_tx_done_cleanup_parsed(void *parsed_result,
+                          __rte_unused struct cmdline *cl,
+                          __rte_unused void *data)
+{
+       struct cmd_tx_done_cleanup_result *res = parsed_result;
+       struct rte_eth_dev *dev;
+       uint16_t port_id = res->port_id;
+       uint16_t queue_id = res->queue_id;
+       uint32_t free_cnt = res->free_cnt;
+       int ret;
+
+       if (!rte_eth_dev_is_valid_port(port_id)) {
+               printf("Invalid port_id %u\n", port_id);
+               return;
+       }
+
+       dev = &rte_eth_devices[port_id];
+       if (queue_id >= dev->data->nb_tx_queues) {
+               printf("Invalid TX queue_id %u\n", queue_id);
Tx? You just want to send a patch to use Rx/Tx. You should keep concurrency.
Good idea. I will fix it.
+               return;
+       }
+
+       if (dev->data->tx_queue_state[queue_id] !=
+               RTE_ETH_QUEUE_STATE_STARTED) {
+               printf("TX queue_id %u not started!\n", queue_id);
Tx?

+               return;
+       }
+
+       /*
+        * rte_eth_tx_done_cleanup is a dataplane API, user must make sure
+        * there are no concurrent access to the same Tx queue (like
+        * rte_eth_tx_burst, rte_eth_dev_tx_queue_stop and so on) when this
API
+        * called.
+        */
And I have some concerns on this. Users cannot know about this unless they read 
your code. I don't think this will likely happen.
So you should document this in testpmd doc when you introduced this command.

Or maybe you can have a way to stop that to happen. Maybe checking "test_done && 
engine != rxonly" before this?
In your comment, the tx forwarding shouldn't happen, right? Every fwd engine 
except rxonly will contain tx.
Well, it's still a rough way because tx may not happen even if it's io fwd.

Maybe other people have better ideas. Otherwise, you should at least document 
it.
@Yigit, Ferruh What do you think? Is there a better way?
I have add doc for noting.
+       ret = rte_eth_tx_done_cleanup(port_id, queue_id, free_cnt);
+       if (ret < 0) {
+               printf("Failed to cleanup mbuf for port %u TX queue %u "
Tx?

+                      "error desc: %s(%d)\n",
+                      port_id, queue_id, strerror(-ret), ret);
+               return;
+       }
+
+       printf("Cleanup port %u TX queue %u mbuf nums: %u\n",
Tx?

+              port_id, queue_id, ret);
+}
+
+cmdline_parse_token_string_t cmd_tx_done_cleanup_clean =
+       TOKEN_STRING_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_tx_done_cleanup_result, clean,
+                                "tx_done_cleanup");
+cmdline_parse_token_string_t cmd_tx_done_cleanup_port =
+       TOKEN_STRING_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_tx_done_cleanup_result, port,
+                                "port");
+cmdline_parse_token_num_t cmd_tx_done_cleanup_port_id =
+       TOKEN_NUM_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_tx_done_cleanup_result, port_id,
+                             UINT16);
+cmdline_parse_token_num_t cmd_tx_done_cleanup_queue_id =
+       TOKEN_NUM_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_tx_done_cleanup_result,
queue_id,
+                             UINT16);
+cmdline_parse_token_num_t cmd_tx_done_cleanup_free_cnt =
+       TOKEN_NUM_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_tx_done_cleanup_result,
free_cnt,
+                             UINT32);
+
+cmdline_parse_inst_t cmd_tx_done_cleanup = {
+       .f = cmd_tx_done_cleanup_parsed,
+       .data = NULL,
+       .help_str = "tx_done_cleanup port <port_id> <queue_id> <free_cnt>",
+       .tokens = {
+               (void *)&cmd_tx_done_cleanup_clean,
+               (void *)&cmd_tx_done_cleanup_port,
+               (void *)&cmd_tx_done_cleanup_port_id,
+               (void *)&cmd_tx_done_cleanup_queue_id,
+               (void *)&cmd_tx_done_cleanup_free_cnt,
+               NULL,
+       },
+};
+
  /*
*****************************************************************
*************** */

  /* list of instructions */
@@ -17035,6 +17125,7 @@ cmdline_parse_ctx_t main_ctx[] = {
        (cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_config_rss_reta,
        (cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_showport_reta,
        (cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_showport_macs,
+       (cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_tx_done_cleanup,
        (cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_config_burst,
        (cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_config_thresh,
        (cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_config_threshold, diff --git
a/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_21_05.rst
b/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_21_05.rst
index 23f7f0b..8077573 100644
--- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_21_05.rst
+++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_21_05.rst
@@ -69,6 +69,8 @@ New Features

    * Added command to display Rx queue used descriptor count.
      ``show port (port_id) rxq (queue_id) desc used count``
+  * Added command to cleanup a Tx queue's mbuf on a port.
+    ``tx_done_cleanup port <port_id> <queue_id> <free_cnt>``


  Removed Items
diff --git a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
index f59eb8a..39281f5 100644
--- a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
+++ b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
@@ -272,6 +272,13 @@ and ready to be processed by the driver on a given RX
queue::

     testpmd> show port (port_id) rxq (queue_id) desc used count

+cleanup txq mbufs
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+Request the driver to free mbufs currently cached by the driver for a
+given port's Tx queue::
+   testpmd> tx_done_cleanup port (port_id) (queue_id) (free_cnt)
+
  show config
  ~~~~~~~~~~~

--
2.7.4
.


Reply via email to