> -----Original Message-----
> From: oulijun <ouli...@huawei.com>
> Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2021 3:56 PM
> To: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.w...@arm.com>; tho...@monjalon.net;
> ferruh.yi...@intel.com
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; linux...@openeuler.org; nd <n...@arm.com>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V2 1/4] config/arm: add Hisilicon
> kunpeng920 implementer
>
>
>
> 在 2021/3/25 15:45, Ruifeng Wang 写道:
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: oulijun <ouli...@huawei.com>
> >> Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2021 3:22 PM
> >> To: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.w...@arm.com>; tho...@monjalon.net;
> >> ferruh.yi...@intel.com
> >> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; linux...@openeuler.org; nd <n...@arm.com>
> >> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V2 1/4] config/arm: add Hisilicon
> >> kunpeng920 implementer
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> 在 2021/3/23 23:40, Ruifeng Wang 写道:
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: oulijun <ouli...@huawei.com>
> >>>> Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 9:52 PM
> >>>> To: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.w...@arm.com>; tho...@monjalon.net;
> >>>> ferruh.yi...@intel.com
> >>>> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; linux...@openeuler.org; nd <n...@arm.com>
> >>>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V2 1/4] config/arm: add Hisilicon
> >>>> kunpeng920 implementer
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> 2021/3/23 16:07, Ruifeng Wang д :
> >>>>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>>>> From: dev <dev-boun...@dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Lijun Ou
> >>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2021 9:36 AM
> >>>>>> To: tho...@monjalon.net; ferruh.yi...@intel.com
> >>>>>> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; linux...@openeuler.org
> >>>>>> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V2 1/4] config/arm: add Hisilicon
> >>>>>> kunpeng920 implementer
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Here addes Kunpeng920 config back which was deleted.
> >
> > There was no Kunpeng920 specific config before change 91c730fd4e09.
> > It would fall back to generic build because the behavior was to do generic
> build for unknown implementor / part number.
> >
> What should we do with this patch? This is because we cannot compile on
> the Kunpeng 920 server without adding generic build.
I see the need to add config for Kunpeng 920.
IMO, the commit message can be refined.
With commit message update,
Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.w...@arm.com>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Fixes: 91c730fd4e09 ("config/arm: remove unused or superfluous
> >>>>>> variables")
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Chengchang Tang <tangchengch...@huawei.com>
> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Lijun Ou <ouli...@huawei.com>
> >>>>>> ---
> >>>>>> V1->V2:
> >>>>>> - rewrite patch title.
> >>>>>> - split the patch into two.
> >>>>>> ---
> >>>>>> config/arm/meson.build | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> >>>>>> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> diff --git a/config/arm/meson.build b/config/arm/meson.build
> >>>>>> index
> >>>>>> 00bc461..3826900 100644
> >>>>>> --- a/config/arm/meson.build
> >>>>>> +++ b/config/arm/meson.build
> >>>>>> @@ -133,6 +133,25 @@ implementer_cavium = {
> >>>>>> }
> >>>>>> }
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> +implementer_hisilicon = {
> >>>>>> + 'description': 'Hisilicon',
> >>>>>> + 'flags': [
> >>>>>> + ['RTE_USE_C11_MEM_MODEL', true],
> >>>>>> + ['RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE', 128],
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Just want to double check.
> >>>>> One Kunpeng920 box I can access have cache line size 64B.
> >>>>>
> >>>> I have a question, which level does RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE refer to?
> >>>> For kunpeng920, L1/L2 cache size is 64B L3 is 128B
> >>>
> >>> Got it.
> >>> I think RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE is not defined for a certain level of cache.
> >>> Data can be prefetched into any level of cache by using different APIs.
> >>>
> >> So our current configuration should be fine.
> >
> > Agree.
> >
> >>>>> Thanks.
> >>>>>> + ['RTE_MAX_NUMA_NODES', 4]
> >>>>>> + ],
> >>>>>> + 'part_number_config': {
> >>>>>> + '0xd01': {
> >>>>>> + 'machine_args': ['-march=armv8.2-a+crypto',
> >>>>>> + '-mtune=tsv110'],
> >>>>>> + 'flag': [['RTE_MACHINE', '"kunpeng920"'],
> >>>>>> + ['RTE_MAX_LCORE', 128],
> >>>>>> + ['RTE_ARM_FEATURE_ATOMICS',
> true]
> >>>>>> + ]
> >>>>>> + }
> >>>>>> + }
> >>>>>> +}
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> implementer_ampere = {
> >>>>>> 'description': 'Ampere Computing',
> >>>>>> 'flags': [
> >>>>>> @@ -190,6 +209,7 @@ implementers = {
> >>>>>> 'generic': implementer_generic,
> >>>>>> '0x41': implementer_arm,
> >>>>>> '0x43': implementer_cavium,
> >>>>>> + '0x48': implementer_hisilicon,
> >>>>>> '0x50': implementer_ampere,
> >>>>>> '0x51': implementer_qualcomm,
> >>>>>> '0x56': implementer_marvell,
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> 2.7.4
> >>>>>
> >>>>> .
> >>>>>
