On 3/9/2021 10:00 PM, Ajit Khaparde wrote:
On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 4:52 AM Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yi...@intel.com> wrote:
On 3/8/2021 10:34 PM, Ajit Khaparde wrote:
Fix formatting in testpmd user guide for hairpin operation.
Fixes: 01817b10d27c ("app/testpmd: change hairpin queues setup")
Cc:sta...@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khapa...@broadcom.com>
Cc: Bing Zhao <bi...@nvidia.com>
Cc: Ori Kam <or...@nvidia.com>
---
doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/run_app.rst | 12 +++++++-----
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/run_app.rst
b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/run_app.rst
index 3035118cdc..8ec2300ee5 100644
--- a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/run_app.rst
+++ b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/run_app.rst
@@ -531,11 +531,13 @@ The command line options are:
* ``--hairpin-mode=0xXX``
- Set the hairpin port mode with bitmask, only valid when hairpin queues
number is set.
- bit 4 - explicit Tx flow rule
- bit 1 - two hairpin ports paired
- bit 0 - two hairpin ports loop
- The default value is 0. Hairpin will use single port mode and implicit Tx
flow mode.
+ Set the hairpin port mode with bitmask, only valid when hairpin queues
number is set::
+
+ bit 4 - explicit Tx flow rule
+ bit 1 - two hairpin ports paired
+ bit 0 - two hairpin ports loop
+ The default value is 0.
+ Hairpin will use single port mode and implicit Tx flow mode.
Not sure if the last line intended to be part of the list, what do you think
only keep bit descriptions in the box but left the last sentences as regular
paragraph.
Ori please correct me if I am wrong with the original intention.
Ori,
Not just indentation. How about this modified text as well?
- bit 0 - two hairpin ports loop
- The default value is 0.
- Hairpin will use single port mode and implicit Tx flow mode.
+ bit 0 - two hairpin ports loop (default)
+
+.. Note::
+
+ When hairpin is used in single port mode, Tx flow rule will be implicit.
Does this statement look right?
Ping
