Hi > -----Original Message----- > From: dev <dev-boun...@dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Ferruh Yigit > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: update qfi definition > > On 3/23/2021 12:11 PM, Raslan Darawsheh wrote: > > qfi field is 8 bits which represent single bit for > > PPP (paging Policy Presence) single bit for RQI > > (Reflective QoS Indicator) and 6 bits for qfi > > (QoS Flow Identifier) > > Can you please put a reference for above information? > > > > This update the doxygen format and the mask for qfi > > to properly identify the full 8 bits of the field. > > > > note: changing the default mask would cause different > > patterns generated by testpmd. > > > > Fixes: 346553db5bd1 ("ethdev: add GTP extension header to flow API") > > Cc: ying.a.w...@intel.com > > Cc: sta...@dpdk.org > > > > Signed-off-by: Raslan Darawsheh <rasl...@nvidia.com> > > --- > > doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst | 3 ++- > > lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h | 4 ++-- > > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst > b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst > > index f59eb8a27d..dd39c4c3c2 100644 > > --- a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst > > +++ b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst > > @@ -3742,7 +3742,8 @@ This section lists supported pattern items and their > attributes, if any. > > - ``gtp_psc``: match GTP PDU extension header with type 0x85. > > > > - ``pdu_type {unsigned}``: PDU type. > > - - ``qfi {unsigned}``: QoS flow identifier. > > + > > + - ``qfi {unsigned}``: PPP, RQI and QoS flow identifier. > > > > - ``pppoes``, ``pppoed``: match PPPoE header. > > > > diff --git a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h > > index 669e677e91..79106e0246 100644 > > --- a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h > > +++ b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h > > @@ -1392,14 +1392,14 @@ static const struct rte_flow_item_meta > rte_flow_item_meta_mask = { > > */ > > struct rte_flow_item_gtp_psc { > > uint8_t pdu_type; /**< PDU type. */ > > - uint8_t qfi; /**< QoS flow identifier. */ > > + uint8_t qfi; /**< PPP, RQI, QoS flow identifier. */ > > }; > > By design requirement, rte_flow_item_* should start with the relevant protocol > header. > > There is already a deprecation notice for using protocol header directly in > the > rte_flow_item* [1] and Adrew/Ivan already fixed a few of them [2]. > > Your patch is not directly related on this, but since you are touching to the > flow_item, would you mind create a protocol struct for it first, and use it in > the "struct rte_flow_item_gtp_psc"? > So the protocol related update can be done in the protocol header, instead of > rte_flow struct. > +1
> > [1] > https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgit.dpdk. > org%2Fdpdk%2Ftree%2Fdoc%2Fguides%2Frel_notes%2Fdeprecation.rst%3Fh%3 > Dv21.02%23n99&data=04%7C01%7Corika%40nvidia.com%7C6391a4c0640 > f4592b70b08d8f058e322%7C43083d15727340c1b7db39efd9ccc17a%7C0%7C0 > %7C637523611870497932%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAw > MDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdat > a=vU%2F5oO47zb9erTnZL1pl9j0nHCKzea3NJgOeo1FTW0Q%3D&reserved= > 0 > > [2] > https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgit.dpdk. > org%2Fnext%2Fdpdk-next- > net%2Fcommit%2F%3Fid%3D4a061a7bd70bfa023de23e8e654e&data=04% > 7C01%7Corika%40nvidia.com%7C6391a4c0640f4592b70b08d8f058e322%7C43 > 083d15727340c1b7db39efd9ccc17a%7C0%7C0%7C637523611870497932%7CU > nknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik > 1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=WurlQ5VSLqFGVthfRj363xZsC > No3xJuvxNQCFVcxdkk%3D&reserved=0