On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 7:19 AM Wenwu Ma <wenwux...@intel.com> wrote:
>
> Before accessing the private data of mempool in
> function rte_pktmbuf_priv_size() and rte_pktmbuf_data_room_size(),
> it is necessary to determine whether the private data exists,
> otherwise it will cause null pointer access.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wenwu Ma <wenwux...@intel.com>
> ---
> lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h
> index c4c9ebfaa..6c2559550 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h
> +++ b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h
> @@ -811,6 +811,9 @@ rte_pktmbuf_data_room_size(struct rte_mempool *mp)
> {
> struct rte_pktmbuf_pool_private *mbp_priv;
>
> + if (mp->private_data_size < sizeof(struct rte_pktmbuf_pool_private))
> + return 0;
If mp->private_data_size updated in the slow path at mempool create
time, why not have this sanity check in the slow path?
> +
> mbp_priv = (struct rte_pktmbuf_pool_private
> *)rte_mempool_get_priv(mp);
> return mbp_priv->mbuf_data_room_size;
> }
> @@ -832,6 +835,9 @@ rte_pktmbuf_priv_size(struct rte_mempool *mp)
> {
> struct rte_pktmbuf_pool_private *mbp_priv;
>
> + if (mp->private_data_size < sizeof(struct rte_pktmbuf_pool_private))
> + return 0;
> +
> mbp_priv = (struct rte_pktmbuf_pool_private
> *)rte_mempool_get_priv(mp);
> return mbp_priv->mbuf_priv_size;
> }
> --
> 2.25.1
>
