On 4/19/2021 8:43 AM, Jack Min wrote:
On Tue, 21-04-13, 16:10, Jeff Guo wrote:
Add the new items to support the flow configuration for IP fragment
packets.
Signed-off-by: Ting Xu <ting...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Guo <jia....@intel.com>
---
app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
[...snip...]
+ [ITEM_IPV4_ID] = {
+ .name = "packet_id",
+ .help = "fragment packet id",
+ .next = NEXT(item_ipv4, NEXT_ENTRY(UNSIGNED), item_param),
+ .args = ARGS(ARGS_ENTRY_HTON(struct rte_flow_item_ipv4,
+ hdr.packet_id)),
+ },
[ITEM_IPV4_FRAGMENT_OFFSET] = {
.name = "fragment_offset",
.help = "fragmentation flags and fragment offset",
@@ -2969,12 +2980,20 @@ static const struct token token_list[] = {
},
[ITEM_IPV6_FRAG_EXT_FRAG_DATA] = {
.name = "frag_data",
- .help = "Fragment flags and offset",
+ .help = "fragment flags and offset",
Will it be better to have a seperate fix patch for this ?
You refer the case update of the help string, 'F' -> 'f', right?
If so this is so small, and cosmetic, update, I think no need to have its own
patch, and while this patch is touching related area, acceptable to fix it here.
