> -----Original Message----- > From: Zhang, Qi Z > Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2021 5:13 PM > To: Yigit, Ferruh <[email protected]>; Huang, Wei > <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Xu, Rosen <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected]; Zhang, Tianfei <[email protected]> > Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 0/2] Fix coverity issues reported in > DPDK-26381 > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Yigit, Ferruh <[email protected]> > > Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2021 4:10 PM > > To: Zhang, Qi Z <[email protected]>; Huang, Wei > > <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Xu, Rosen <[email protected]> > > Cc: [email protected]; Zhang, Tianfei <[email protected]> > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 0/2] Fix coverity issues reported in > > DPDK-26381 > > > > On 4/1/2021 1:17 PM, Zhang, Qi Z wrote: > > > > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > > >> From: Huang, Wei <[email protected]> > > >> Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2021 4:24 PM > > >> To: [email protected]; Xu, Rosen <[email protected]>; Zhang, Qi Z > > >> <[email protected]> > > >> Cc: [email protected]; Zhang, Tianfei <[email protected]>; > > >> Huang, Wei <[email protected]> > > >> Subject: [PATCH v1 0/2] Fix coverity issues reported in DPDK-26381 > > >> > > >> Below coverity issues are fixed in this patch set. > > >> 367480, 367482 > > >> > > >> Wei Huang (2): > > >> raw/ifpga/base: use untained variable as argument > > >> raw/ifpga/base: add argument to use untained variable > > >> > > >> drivers/raw/ifpga/base/ifpga_fme.c | 15 ++++++++------- > > >> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > >> > > >> -- > > >> 2.29.2 > > > > > > Applied to dpdk-next-net-intel. > > > > > > > Hi Qi, > > > > What is the status of this set? > > It is not merged to your tree, and its patchwork status is 'Rejected'. > > I think the status is wrong updated, and the patches are just dropped after > re-sync with next-net, thanks for capture this.
OK, the patch set should be rejected, as they already be covered by below patch. http://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/[email protected]/ So there is no miss operation in path work, just can't remember what happened :) We are OK now.
