On 4/21/2021 8:56 AM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
On 4/21/2021 7:18 AM, Huisong Li wrote:
Hi Kevin,

Thank you for your review.

This patchset has been applied to dpdk-next-net/main. I will send a new patch to fix it.

Your suggestion is better.  I intend to use the following format:

********************* Flow control info for port 0 *********************
FC mode:
     Rx pause: off
     Tx pause: off
Autoneg: on
Pause time: 0x680
High waterline: 0x80
Low waterline: 0x40
Send XON: on
Forward MAC control frames: off
*********************************** End ********************************


I missed the outstanding comments from Kevin, I will drop the patch from next-net, we can proceed with next version.


v2 dropped from tree, patchwork status updated. Please send v3.


在 2021/4/19 23:30, Kevin Traynor 写道:
On 15/04/2021 07:46, Min Hu (Connor) wrote:
From: Huisong Li <lihuis...@huawei.com>

This patch supports the query of the link flow control parameter
on a port.

The command format is as follows:
show port <port_id> flow_ctrl

Signed-off-by: Huisong Li <lihuis...@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Min Hu (Connor) <humi...@huawei.com>
Hi Connor,

Just a few minor comments,

thanks,
Kevin.

---
  app/test-pmd/cmdline.c                      | 83 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst |  7 +++
  2 files changed, 90 insertions(+)

diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
index 5bf1497..9fa85c4 100644
--- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
+++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
@@ -258,6 +258,9 @@ static void cmd_help_long_parsed(void *parsed_result,
              "show port (port_id) fec_mode"
              "    Show fec mode of a port.\n\n"
+
+            "show port <port_id> flow_ctrl"
+            "    Show flow control info of a port.\n\n"
          );
      }
@@ -6863,6 +6866,85 @@ cmdline_parse_inst_t cmd_set_allmulti_mode_one = {
      },
  };
+/* *** GET CURRENT ETHERNET LINK FLOW CONTROL *** */
+struct cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show {
+    cmdline_fixed_string_t show;
+    cmdline_fixed_string_t port;
+    portid_t port_id;
+    cmdline_fixed_string_t flow_ctrl;
+};
+
+cmdline_parse_token_string_t cmd_lfc_show_show =
+    TOKEN_STRING_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show,
+                show, "show");
+cmdline_parse_token_string_t cmd_lfc_show_port =
+    TOKEN_STRING_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show,
+                port, "port");
+cmdline_parse_token_num_t cmd_lfc_show_portid =
+    TOKEN_NUM_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show,
+                port_id, RTE_UINT16);
+cmdline_parse_token_string_t cmd_lfc_show_flow_ctrl =
+    TOKEN_STRING_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show,
+                flow_ctrl, "flow_ctrl");
+
+static void
+cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show_parsed(void *parsed_result,
+                  __rte_unused struct cmdline *cl,
+                  __rte_unused void *data)
+{
+    struct cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show *res = parsed_result;
+    static const char *info_border = "*********************";
+    struct rte_eth_fc_conf fc_conf;
+    bool rx_fc_en = false;
+    bool tx_fc_en = false;
+    int ret;
+
+    if (!rte_eth_dev_is_valid_port(res->port_id)) {
This ^ is already checked in rte_eth_dev_flow_ctrl_get() below. That
said, it's not doing any harm here and you would need to add check for
-ENODEV below if you wanted to tell the user that the port is invalid
so either way is ok IMHO.

+        printf("Invalid port id %u\n", res->port_id);
+        return;
+    }
+
+    ret = rte_eth_dev_flow_ctrl_get(res->port_id, &fc_conf);
+    if (ret != 0) {
+        printf("Failed to get current flow ctrl information: err = %d\n",
+               ret);
+        return;
+    }
+
+    if ((fc_conf.mode == RTE_FC_RX_PAUSE) || (fc_conf.mode == RTE_FC_FULL))
You can remove unnecessary brackets, i.e.
if (fc_conf.mode == RTE_FC_RX_PAUSE || fc_conf.mode == RTE_FC_FULL)


+        rx_fc_en = true;
+    if ((fc_conf.mode == RTE_FC_TX_PAUSE) || (fc_conf.mode == RTE_FC_FULL))
same comment on brackets

+        tx_fc_en = true;
+
+    printf("\n%s Flow control infos for port %-2d %s\n",
s/infos/info/

+        info_border, res->port_id, info_border);
+    printf("FC mode:\n");
It's better not to introduce a new acronym (even if it's a bit obvious)

+    printf("   Rx: %s\n", rx_fc_en ? "On" : "Off");
+    printf("   Tx: %s\n", tx_fc_en ? "On" : "Off");
+    printf("FC autoneg status: %s\n", fc_conf.autoneg != 0 ? "On" : "Off");
+    printf("pause_time: 0x%x\n", fc_conf.pause_time);
+    printf("high_water: 0x%x\n", fc_conf.high_water);
+    printf("low_water: 0x%x\n", fc_conf.low_water);
+    printf("Send Xon: %s\n", fc_conf.send_xon ? "On" : "Off");
+    printf("mac ctrl frame fwd: %s\n",
+        fc_conf.mac_ctrl_frame_fwd ? "On" : "Off");
There's a mix of struct member names and descriptions here. I think it's
better to stick to one or the other.

i.e. currently

testpmd> show port 0 flow_ctrl

********************* Flow control infos for port 0  *********************
FC mode:
    Rx: Off
    Tx: Off
FC autoneg status: On
pause_time: 0x680
high_water: 0x80
low_water: 0x40
Send Xon: On
Forward MAC control frames: Off


Suggestion:

********************* Flow control info for port 0  *********************
Rx mode: off
Tx mode: off
Autoneg: on
Pause time: 0x680
High water: 0x80
Low water: 0x40
Send XON: on
Forward MAC control frames: off
***********************************   End  ********************************

As ever, display is subjective, so please take as suggestion, you/others
may have different view.


+    printf("\n%s**************   End  ***********%s\n",
+        info_border, info_border);
+}
+
+cmdline_parse_inst_t cmd_link_flow_control_show = {
+    .f = cmd_link_flow_ctrl_show_parsed,
+    .data = NULL,
+    .help_str = "show port <port_id> flow_ctrl",
+    .tokens = {
+        (void *)&cmd_lfc_show_show,
+        (void *)&cmd_lfc_show_port,
+        (void *)&cmd_lfc_show_portid,
+        (void *)&cmd_lfc_show_flow_ctrl,
+        NULL,
+    },
+};
+
  /* *** SETUP ETHERNET LINK FLOW CONTROL *** */
  struct cmd_link_flow_ctrl_set_result {
      cmdline_fixed_string_t set;
@@ -17001,6 +17083,7 @@ cmdline_parse_ctx_t main_ctx[] = {
      (cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_link_flow_control_set_xon,
      (cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_link_flow_control_set_macfwd,
      (cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_link_flow_control_set_autoneg,
+    (cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_link_flow_control_show,
      (cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_priority_flow_control_set,
      (cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_config_dcb,
      (cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_read_reg,
diff --git a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
index e3bfed5..3fca011 100644
--- a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
+++ b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
@@ -1526,6 +1526,13 @@ Where:
  * ``autoneg``: Change the auto-negotiation parameter.
+show flow ctrl
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+show the link flow control parameter on a port::
+
+   testpmd> show port <port_id> flow_ctrl
+
  set pfc_ctrl rx
  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

.


Reply via email to