On 5/10/2021 1:29 PM, Gregory Etelson wrote: > Hello Ferruh, > > The patch has failed ci/Intel-compilation test. > (http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/2021-May/193327.html) > I've checked that with Thomas. He confirmed that was a known fault and > should not affect the current patch. > Can we proceed with the patch integration ? >
Hi Gregory, Thanks for the new version and additional effort for clarification, agree that CI issue is something else, patch is already assigned to Raslan and we can proceed with his tree. Thanks, ferruh > Thank you. > > Regards, > Gregory > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Gregory Etelson <[email protected]> >> Sent: Thursday, May 6, 2021 12:58 >> To: [email protected] >> Cc: Gregory Etelson <[email protected]>; Matan Azrad >> <[email protected]>; Ori Kam <[email protected]>; Raslan Darawsheh >> <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected]; Slava >> Ovsiienko <[email protected]>; Shahaf Shuler >> <[email protected]> >> Subject: [PATCH v4] net/mlx5: fix tunnel offload private items location >> >> Tunnel offload API requires application to query PMD for specific flow items >> and actions. Application uses these PMD specific elements to build flow >> rules according to the tunnel offload model. >> The model does not restrict private elements location in a flow rule, but the >> current MLX5 PMD implementation expects that tunnel offload rule will >> begin with PMD specific elements. >> The patch removes that placement limitation. >> >> Cc: [email protected] >> >> Fixes: 4ec6360de37d ("net/mlx5: implement tunnel offload") >> >> Signed-off-by: Gregory Etelson <[email protected]> >> Acked-by: Viacheslav Ovsiienko <[email protected]> >> --- >> v2: Update the patch comment. >> v3: Remove testpmd patch from the series. >> v4: Remove redundant verifications in flow_dv_validate. <...>
