> I see this patchset is merged in the crypto tree but I guess it is not > definitive. > Am I right it is too late to do such refactoring after -rc2? > What is the intent? > The case is not failing in my testing. Neither it is reproducible at Ciara's end. Ciara has asked to rerun the CI to check if it is false positive. I don't want to defer this series as it passes all test except the CI and has been Reviewed by multiple people. I am merging this patch for RC2. If there is any issue, it can be fixed in RC3 Regards, Akhil
- [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/7] test: refactor crypto unit test ... Ciara Power
- [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/7] test: introduce parent test... Ciara Power
- [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 4/7] test/crypto: replace unsupp... Ciara Power
- [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/7] app/test: refactor of unit ... Ciara Power
- [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/7] test/crypto: refactor to us... Ciara Power
- [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 5/7] test/crypto: move testsuite... Ciara Power
- [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 6/7] test/crypto: fix return val... Ciara Power
- [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 7/7] test/crypto: dynamically bu... Ciara Power
- Re: [dpdk-dev] [EXT] [PATCH v4 0/7] test: refactor cr... Akhil Goyal
- Re: [dpdk-dev] [EXT] [PATCH v4 0/7] test: refacto... Thomas Monjalon
- Re: [dpdk-dev] [EXT] [PATCH v4 0/7] test: ref... Akhil Goyal
- Re: [dpdk-dev] [EXT] [PATCH v4 0/7] test:... Thomas Monjalon
- Re: [dpdk-dev] [EXT] [PATCH v4 0/7] ... Akhil Goyal
- Re: [dpdk-dev] [EXT] [PATCH v4 0/7] test: refacto... Aaron Conole