> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yigit, Ferruh <[email protected]>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2021 2:21 PM
> To: Dumitrescu, Cristian <[email protected]>; Haifei Luo
> <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; Li, Xiaoyun <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Singh,
> Jasvinder <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] app/testpmd: add CLI for action meter color
> 
> On 5/11/2021 1:34 PM, Dumitrescu, Cristian wrote:
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Yigit, Ferruh <[email protected]>
> >> Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2021 12:35 PM
> >> To: Haifei Luo <[email protected]>; [email protected];
> [email protected];
> >> [email protected]; Li, Xiaoyun <[email protected]>
> >> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Singh,
> >> Jasvinder <[email protected]>; Dumitrescu, Cristian
> >> <[email protected]>
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] app/testpmd: add CLI for action meter color
> >>
> >> On 5/11/2021 10:28 AM, Haifei Luo wrote:
> >>> Currently action RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_METER_COLOR is defined.
> >>> Add the CLI for this action in meter policy: color type (types)
> >>> There are three types: green, yellow and red.
> >>>
> >>> Example for the new policy meter CLIs:
> >>>    add port meter policy 0 1 g_actions color type green / end y_actions
> >>>         color type yellow / end r_actions color type red / end
> >>>
> >>> In the above command, the action type is
> >> RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_METER_COLOR,
> >>> the meter policy action list: green -> green, yellow -> yellow, red -> 
> >>> red.
> >>>
> >>> V2: rebase the latest code.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Haifei Luo <[email protected]>
> >>> Acked-by: Ori Kam <[email protected]>
> >>
> >>
> >> cc'ed Jasvinder & Cristian for review.
> >>
> >> This patch is not a fix but adding support for testing new meter action
> type,
> >> so
> >> I assume it can be postponed to next release if missing review from
> >> maintainers.
> >
> > Hi Ferruh,
> >
> > This patch looks good to me, but I think it should be reviewed and acked by
> Xiaoyun, the testpmd maintainer, who is already in the To: list?
> >
> 
> If so I will proceed with your explicit ack:
> Cristian Dumitrescu <[email protected]>
> 
> Xiaoyun is main maintainer but for some submodules we rely on the relevant
> maintainer, like flow API related part to Ori or for meter/tm part to you 
> etc..

Acked-by: Cristian Dumitrescu <[email protected]>

Reply via email to