On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 11:05 AM Ali Alnubani <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Christian, > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Christian Ehrhardt <[email protected]> > > Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2021 11:49 AM > > To: dpdk stable <[email protected]> > > Cc: dev <[email protected]>; Abhishek Marathe > > <[email protected]>; Akhil Goyal <[email protected]>; > > Ali Alnubani <[email protected]>; Walker, Benjamin > > <[email protected]>; David Christensen > > <[email protected]>; Govindharajan, Hariprasad > > <[email protected]>; Hemant Agrawal > > <[email protected]>; Ian Stokes <[email protected]>; Jerin > > Jacob <[email protected]>; John McNamara <[email protected]>; > > Ju-Hyoung Lee <[email protected]>; Kevin Traynor > > <[email protected]>; Luca Boccassi <[email protected]>; Pei Zhang > > <[email protected]>; Yu, PingX <[email protected]>; Xu, Qian Q > > <[email protected]>; Raslan Darawsheh <[email protected]>; NBU- > > Contact-Thomas Monjalon <[email protected]>; Peng, Yuan > > <[email protected]>; Chen, Zhaoyan <[email protected]> > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] 19.11.9 patches review and test - V2 > > > > On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 7:52 AM Christian Ehrhardt > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Here is version 2 of the list of patches targeted for stable release > > > 19.11.9. > > > Thanks to plenty of helpful developers we've collected a few more > > > backports by now and sorted out a few rare compile time issues that were > > found with -rc1. > > > > > > The planned date for the final release of 19.11.9 is now 18th of June. > > > > > > Please help with testing and validation of your use cases and report > > > any issues/results with reply-all to this mail. For the final release > > > the fixes and reported validations will be added to the release notes. > > > > > > A release candidate tarball can be found at: > > > > > > https://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/tag/?id=v19.11.9-rc2 > > > > Unfortunately there were further build issues with new suse kernels. > > The fix for some of them, now breaks others :-/ The final fix didn't > > finalize > > yet, but as a TL;DR it means there will be a -rc3 down the road. > > > > I beg your pardon for the extra work. > > If you are testing non-suse and are already deep into the tests you likely > > can > > continue that. > > If you didn't start your tests yet then I'd recommend holding back until > > -rc3 > > exists. > > > > I see some build failures with gcc 11. Do we expect this release to support > it?
I have added all that were targeted at stable@dpdk, but I remember that Kevin mentioned a few missing in 20.11.x due to the submissions missing to go to stable@dpdk. The same could be the case here. @Kevin could you have a look at 19.11 and if there are some missing point me to the commits to pick up? @Ali - if you have a particular bug signature that might help to identify the right patch. > I also see some doxygen errors with version 1.9.1 in Fedora Rawhide. Will > open a Bugzilla ticket. Rawhide builds of 19.11.x were broken for a while now, but yeah filing the bug surely is the right path. > Thanks, > Ali -- Christian Ehrhardt Staff Engineer, Ubuntu Server Canonical Ltd
