> -----Original Message----- > From: Thomas Monjalon <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2021 3:07 PM > To: [email protected]; Ruifeng Wang <[email protected]>; > Honnappa Nagarahalli <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected]; Thierry Herbelot <[email protected]>; Juraj > Linkeš <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] config/arm: add Qualcomm Centriq 2400 > part number > > 25/05/2021 10:24, Thierry Herbelot: > > 0xc00 is for "SoC 2.0" Qualcom Centriq servers. > > 0x800 is for "SoC 1.1". > > > > Cc: Jerin Jacob <[email protected]> > > Cc: Ruifeng Wang <[email protected]> > > Cc: Honnappa Nagarahalli <[email protected]> > > Cc: Juraj Linkeš <[email protected]> > > > > Signed-off-by: Thierry Herbelot <[email protected]> > > -- > > V2: add maintainers as Cc > > --- > > --- a/config/arm/meson.build > > +++ b/config/arm/meson.build > > @@ -226,6 +226,7 @@ soc_bluefield = { > > soc_centriq2400 = { > > 'description': 'Qualcomm Centriq 2400', > > 'implementer': '0x51', > > + 'part_number': '0x800', To add support for a new part number, I think it should be added to implementer_qualcomm. If cross compile for the new soc is needed, it needs a new soc_xx block. I'm wondering this is a real request? I assume SoC 1.0 will have no config difference from SoC 2.0.
Thanks. > > 'part_number': '0xc00', > > 'numa': false > > } > > Any comment or ack? >
