Hi Ray, Sounds reasonable, however I'm not curently working on this project, so will have to leave to others to propose. Fiona
> -----Original Message----- > From: Kinsella, Ray <m...@ashroe.eu> > Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2021 11:33 AM > To: Trahe, Fiona <fiona.tr...@intel.com>; Ashish Gupta > <ashish.gu...@marvell.com>; Thomas > Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net>; Stephen Hemminger > <step...@networkplumber.org>; dpdk-dev > <dev@dpdk.org> > Subject: Experimental symbols in compressdev lib > > Hi Fiona & Ashish, > > The following compressdev experimental symbols are present in both v21.05 and > v19.11 release. > These symbols should be considered for promotion to stable as part of the v22 > ABI in DPDK 21.11, as > they have been experimental for >= 2yrs at this point. > > * rte_compressdev_capability_get > * rte_compressdev_close > * rte_compressdev_configure > * rte_compressdev_count > * rte_compressdev_dequeue_burst > * rte_compressdev_devices_get > * rte_compressdev_enqueue_burst > * rte_compressdev_get_dev_id > * rte_compressdev_get_feature_name > * rte_compressdev_info_get > * rte_compressdev_name_get > * rte_compressdev_pmd_allocate > * rte_compressdev_pmd_create > * rte_compressdev_pmd_destroy > * rte_compressdev_pmd_get_named_dev > * rte_compressdev_pmd_parse_input_args > * rte_compressdev_pmd_release_device > * rte_compressdev_private_xform_create > * rte_compressdev_private_xform_free > * rte_compressdev_queue_pair_count > * rte_compressdev_queue_pair_setup > * rte_compressdev_socket_id > * rte_compressdev_start > * rte_compressdev_stats_get > * rte_compressdev_stats_reset > * rte_compressdev_stop > * rte_compressdev_stream_create > * rte_compressdev_stream_free > * rte_comp_get_feature_name > * rte_comp_op_alloc > * rte_comp_op_bulk_alloc > * rte_comp_op_bulk_free > * rte_comp_op_free > * rte_comp_op_pool_create > > Ray K
