Hi Ray, That request was considered for 20.11. But this was deferred by the community while waiting for other vendors who may be willing to contribute their own PMDs. Any specific concern with this not being on a tracked ABI?
Thanks Nic > -----Original Message----- > From: Kinsella, Ray <m...@ashroe.eu> > Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2021 3:35 AM > To: Chautru, Nicolas <nicolas.chau...@intel.com>; Thomas Monjalon > <tho...@monjalon.net>; Stephen Hemminger > <step...@networkplumber.org>; dpdk-dev <dev@dpdk.org> > Subject: Experimental symbols in bbdev lib > > Hi Nicolas > > The following bbdev experimental symbols are present in both v21.05 and > v19.11 release. These symbols should be considered for promotion to stable > as part of the v22 ABI in DPDK 21.11, as they have been experimental for >= > 2yrs at this point. > > * rte_bbdev_allocate > * rte_bbdev_callback_register > * rte_bbdev_callback_unregister > * rte_bbdev_close > * rte_bbdev_count > * rte_bbdev_dec_op_alloc_bulk > * rte_bbdev_dec_op_free_bulk > * rte_bbdev_dequeue_dec_ops > * rte_bbdev_dequeue_enc_ops > * rte_bbdev_devices > * rte_bbdev_enc_op_alloc_bulk > * rte_bbdev_enc_op_free_bulk > * rte_bbdev_enqueue_dec_ops > * rte_bbdev_enqueue_enc_ops > * rte_bbdev_find_next > * rte_bbdev_get_named_dev > * rte_bbdev_info_get > * rte_bbdev_intr_enable > * rte_bbdev_is_valid > * rte_bbdev_op_pool_create > * rte_bbdev_op_type_str > * rte_bbdev_pmd_callback_process > * rte_bbdev_queue_configure > * rte_bbdev_queue_info_get > * rte_bbdev_queue_intr_ctl > * rte_bbdev_queue_intr_disable > * rte_bbdev_queue_intr_enable > * rte_bbdev_queue_start > * rte_bbdev_queue_stop > * rte_bbdev_release > * rte_bbdev_setup_queues > * rte_bbdev_start > * rte_bbdev_stats_get > * rte_bbdev_stats_reset > * rte_bbdev_stop > > Ray K
