在 2021/7/7 16:25, Andrew Rybchenko 写道:
On 7/7/21 5:55 AM, Huisong Li wrote:
在 2021/7/6 16:36, Andrew Rybchenko 写道:
@David, could you take a look at the ABI breakage warnings for
the patch. May we ignore it since ABI looks backward
compatible? Or should be marked as a minor change ABI
which is backward compatible with DPDK_21?
On 7/6/21 7:10 AM, Huisong Li wrote:
Currently, if dev_configure is not called or fails to be called, users
can still call dev_start successfully. So it is necessary to have a flag
which indicates whether the device is configured, to control whether
dev_start can be called and eliminate dependency on user invocation
order.
The flag stored in "struct rte_eth_dev_data" is more reasonable than
"enum rte_eth_dev_state". "enum rte_eth_dev_state" is private to the
primary and secondary processes, and can be independently controlled.
However, the secondary process does not make resource allocations and
does not call dev_configure(). These are done by the primary process
and can be obtained or used by the secondary process. So this patch
adds a "dev_configured" flag in "rte_eth_dev_data", like "dev_started".
Signed-off-by: Huisong Li <lihuis...@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybche...@oktetlabs.ru>
---
v1 -> v2:
- adjusting the description of patch.
---
lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev_core.h | 6 +++++-
2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c b/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
index c607eab..6540432 100644
--- a/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
+++ b/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
@@ -1356,6 +1356,13 @@ rte_eth_dev_configure(uint16_t port_id,
uint16_t nb_rx_q, uint16_t nb_tx_q,
return -EBUSY;
}
+ /*
+ * Ensure that "dev_configured" is always 0 each time prepare to do
+ * dev_configure() to avoid any non-anticipated behaviour.
+ * And set to 1 when dev_configure() is executed successfully.
+ */
+ dev->data->dev_configured = 0;
+
/* Store original config, as rollback required on failure */
memcpy(&orig_conf, &dev->data->dev_conf,
sizeof(dev->data->dev_conf));
@@ -1606,6 +1613,8 @@ rte_eth_dev_configure(uint16_t port_id,
uint16_t nb_rx_q, uint16_t nb_tx_q,
}
rte_ethdev_trace_configure(port_id, nb_rx_q, nb_tx_q,
dev_conf, 0);
+ dev->data->dev_configured = 1;
+
I think it should be inserted before the trace, since tracing
is intentionally put close to return without any empty lines
in between.
All right. Do I need to send a patch V3?
Since the patch is waiting for resolution for ABI warning,
please, send v3 with my Reviewed-by and ack from Konstantin.
It will be a bit easier to apply when it is OK to do it.
.
ok. I will send patch V3.