> -----Original Message-----
> From: Qiu, Michael
> Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2015 8:59 AM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Cc: Chen, Jing D; Iremonger, Bernard; He, Shaopeng; Qiu, Michael
> Subject: [PATCH 1/2 v2] fm10k: Free queues when close port
> 
> When close a port, lots of memory should be released, such as software
> rings, queues, etc.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michael Qiu <michael.qiu at intel.com>

Hi Michael,

There are two comments inline.


> ---
> change log:
>  v2 --> v1: remove __rte_unused flag
> 
>  drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k_ethdev.c | 37
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k_ethdev.c
> b/drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k_ethdev.c
> index 87852ed..e310698 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k_ethdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k_ethdev.c
> @@ -52,6 +52,10 @@
> 
>  static void fm10k_close_mbx_service(struct fm10k_hw *hw);
> 
> +static void fm10k_tx_queue_release(void *queue);
> +
> +static void fm10k_rx_queue_release(void *queue);
> +
>  static void
>  fm10k_mbx_initlock(struct fm10k_hw *hw)  { @@ -665,11 +669,35 @@
> fm10k_dev_stop(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> 
>       PMD_INIT_FUNC_TRACE();
> 
> -     for (i = 0; i < dev->data->nb_tx_queues; i++)
> -             fm10k_dev_tx_queue_stop(dev, i);
> +     if (dev->data->tx_queues)
> +             for (i = 0; i < dev->data->nb_tx_queues; i++)
> +                     fm10k_dev_tx_queue_stop(dev, i);
> +
> +     if (dev->data->rx_queues)
> +             for (i = 0; i < dev->data->nb_rx_queues; i++)
> +                     fm10k_dev_rx_queue_stop(dev, i);
> +}
> 
> -     for (i = 0; i < dev->data->nb_rx_queues; i++)
> -             fm10k_dev_rx_queue_stop(dev, i);
> +static void
> +fm10k_dev_queue_release(struct rte_eth_dev *dev) {
> +     int i;
> +
> +     PMD_INIT_FUNC_TRACE();
> +
> +     if (dev->data->tx_queues) {
> +             for (i = 0; i < dev->data->nb_tx_queues; i++)
> +                     fm10k_tx_queue_release(dev->data-
> >tx_queues[i]);
> +             rte_free(dev->data->tx_queues);
> +             dev->data->tx_queues = NULL;

The following line should be added here:
dev->data->nb_tx_queues = 0;

> +     }
> +
> +     if (dev->data->rx_queues) {
> +             for (i = 0; i < dev->data->nb_rx_queues; i++)
> +                     fm10k_rx_queue_release(dev->data-
> >rx_queues[i]);
> +             rte_free(dev->data->rx_queues);
> +             dev->data->rx_queues = NULL;

The following line should be added here:
dev->data->nb_rx_queues = 0;

> +     }
>  }
> 
>  static void
> @@ -682,6 +710,7 @@ fm10k_dev_close(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
>       /* Stop mailbox service first */
>       fm10k_close_mbx_service(hw);
>       fm10k_dev_stop(dev);
> +     fm10k_dev_queue_release(dev);
>       fm10k_stop_hw(hw);
>  }
> 
> --
> 1.9.3

Reply via email to