On Thu, 22 Jul 2021 13:15:04 +0300 Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybche...@oktetlabs.ru> wrote:
> > I don't think we care about type of transmission in this level, I assume we > > define min MTU mainly for the HW limitation and configuration. That is why > > it > > makes sense to me to use Ethernet frame lenght limitation (not IPv4 one). > > +1 Also it is important that DPDK follow the conventions of other software such as Linux and BSD. Cisco and Juniper already disagree about whether header should be included in what is defined as MTU; i.e Cisco says 1514 and Juniper says 1500.
