Hi Radu, > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Update ipsec_xform definition to include ESN field. > > Signed-off-by: Declan Doherty <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Radu Nicolau <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Abhijit Sinha <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Martin Buckley <[email protected]> > --- > lib/security/rte_security.h | 8 ++++++++ > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/lib/security/rte_security.h b/lib/security/rte_security.h > index 03572b10ab..702de58b48 100644 > --- a/lib/security/rte_security.h > +++ b/lib/security/rte_security.h > @@ -240,6 +240,14 @@ struct rte_security_ipsec_xform { > */ > uint32_t mss; > /**< IPsec payload Maximum Segment Size */ > + union { > + uint64_t value; > + struct { > + uint32_t low; > + uint32_t hi; > + }; > + } esn; > + /**< Extended Sequence Number */ > };
Can we use the following change for monitoring ESN? http://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/[email protected]/ I believe ESN is not required to be set as SA parameter, it is normally maintained by the PMD and application should be notified if a limit is reached. Regards, Akhil
