Folks, On 07/09/2021 12:45, Akhil Goyal wrote: >>> Do you think all the asym APIs are not eligible for promoting it to stable >> APIs? >>> I haven't seen any changes for quite some time and we cannot have it >>> experimental Forever. >>> The APIs which you think are expected to change, we can leave them as >>> experimental And mark the others as stable. >> We could potentially make capability related functions stable but for others >> there are still some many uncertainties, another example: >> Ecdsa op expects 'k' in "in the interval (1, n-1)", openssl pmd will not even >> have function that accepts 'k' (although optionally inverse of k yes), what >> should user put then here? >> >> This API needs more attention I believe, I can send patches for it after >> 21.11 >> release. >> My opinion is that we should push all this by another year. >> > Ok will drop this patch for now. >
Look since everyone is in alignment here, I am going to ask the symbol bot to ignore the asym crypto APIs for the next year. Thanks for the diligence on this, and thanks to Fan for sending me an FYI. Ray K
