Hi Neil > -----Original Message----- > From: Zhang, Helin > Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2015 3:04 PM > To: dev at dpdk.org > Cc: Cao, Min; Liu, Jijiang; Wu, Jingjing; Ananyev, Konstantin; Richardson, > Bruce; > olivier.matz at 6wind.com; Zhang, Helin > Subject: [PATCH v3 2/7] mbuf: use the reserved 16 bits for double vlan > > Use the reserved 16 bits in rte_mbuf structure for the outer vlan, also add > QinQ > offloading flags for both RX and TX sides. > > Signed-off-by: Helin Zhang <helin.zhang at intel.com> > --- > lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h | 10 +++++++++- > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > v2 changes: > * Fixed a typo. > > diff --git a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h index > ab6de67..84fe181 100644 > --- a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h > +++ b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h > @@ -101,11 +101,17 @@ extern "C" { > #define PKT_RX_TUNNEL_IPV6_HDR (1ULL << 12) /**< RX tunnel packet with > IPv6 header. */ > #define PKT_RX_FDIR_ID (1ULL << 13) /**< FD id reported if FDIR match. > */ > #define PKT_RX_FDIR_FLX (1ULL << 14) /**< Flexible bytes reported if > FDIR match. */ > +#define PKT_RX_QINQ_PKT (1ULL << 15) /**< RX packet with double > VLAN stripped. */ > /* add new RX flags here */ > > /* add new TX flags here */ > > /** > + * Second VLAN insertion (QinQ) flag. > + */ > +#define PKT_TX_QINQ_PKT (1ULL << 49) /**< TX packet with double > VLAN inserted. */ > + > +/** > * TCP segmentation offload. To enable this offload feature for a > * packet to be transmitted on hardware supporting TSO: > * - set the PKT_TX_TCP_SEG flag in mbuf->ol_flags (this flag implies @@ > -279,7 +285,7 @@ struct rte_mbuf { > uint16_t data_len; /**< Amount of data in segment buffer. */ > uint32_t pkt_len; /**< Total pkt len: sum of all segments. */ > uint16_t vlan_tci; /**< VLAN Tag Control Identifier (CPU order) > */ > - uint16_t reserved; > + uint16_t vlan_tci_outer; /**< Outer VLAN Tag Control Identifier (CPU > +order) */ Do you think here is a ABI break or not? Just using the reserved 16 bits, which was intended for the second_vlan_tag. Thanks in advance! I did not see any "Incompatible" reported by validate_abi.sh.
Regards, Helin > union { > uint32_t rss; /**< RSS hash result if RSS enabled */ > struct { > @@ -777,6 +783,7 @@ static inline void rte_pktmbuf_reset(struct rte_mbuf *m) > m->pkt_len = 0; > m->tx_offload = 0; > m->vlan_tci = 0; > + m->vlan_tci_outer = 0; > m->nb_segs = 1; > m->port = 0xff; > > @@ -849,6 +856,7 @@ static inline void rte_pktmbuf_attach(struct rte_mbuf *mi, > struct rte_mbuf *m) > mi->data_len = m->data_len; > mi->port = m->port; > mi->vlan_tci = m->vlan_tci; > + mi->vlan_tci_outer = m->vlan_tci_outer; > mi->tx_offload = m->tx_offload; > mi->hash = m->hash; > > -- > 1.9.3