Hi David, > -----Original Message----- > From: David Marchand <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, September 10, 2021 3:18 PM > To: Xia, Chenbo <[email protected]> > Cc: dev <[email protected]>; Dumitrescu, Cristian <[email protected]>; > Yigit, Ferruh <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 6/8] examples/ip_pipeline: remove setting of > PCI ID and address > > On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 4:38 AM Chenbo Xia <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > PCI ID and address in structure rte_kni_conf are never used and > > will be removed in kni library. So remove the setting of them > > first in the example. > > > > Signed-off-by: Chenbo Xia <[email protected]> > > (forgot to Cc: Ferruh in previous comment) > Ditto patch 5. > > I would tag with a Fixes: on ethtool removal. > Plus, this is the same kind of cleanup wrt kni, you can squash those > two patches together.
A question about squash patch 5 and 6, then how should I title the combined patch? Because there're both test change and example change. I'd like know your suggestion. Thanks, Chenbo > > > Too bad we do not have a deprecation notice. > lib/kni/rte_kni.h: struct rte_pci_addr addr; /* depreciated */ > lib/kni/rte_kni.h: struct rte_pci_id id; /* depreciated */ > > Can we plan for this cleanup? > > > -- > David Marchand
