I saw a lot of patches failed on test_scatter_mbuf_2048, the case could be passed in intel lab.
This is maintained by UNL guys. + unl. > -----Original Message----- > From: Honnappa Nagarahalli <[email protected]> > Sent: 2021年10月18日 22:54 > To: Honnappa Nagarahalli <[email protected]>; [email protected]; > [email protected]; Ananyev, Konstantin > <[email protected]> > Cc: nd <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Tu, Lijuan > <[email protected]>; nd <[email protected]> > Subject: RE: [PATCH] ring: fix size of name array in ring structure > > This patch has a CI failure in DTS in test_scatter_mbuf_2048 for > Fortville_Spirit > NIC. I am not sure how this change is related to the failure. The log is as > follows: > > TestScatter: Test Case test_scatter_mbuf_2048 Result FAILED: 'packet receive > error' > > Has anyone seen this error? Is this a known issue? > > Thanks, > Honnappa > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Honnappa Nagarahalli <[email protected]> > > Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2021 3:56 PM > > To: [email protected]; Honnappa Nagarahalli <[email protected]>; > > [email protected]; [email protected] > > Cc: nd <[email protected]>; [email protected] > > Subject: [PATCH] ring: fix size of name array in ring structure > > > > Use correct define for the name array size. The change breaks ABI and > > hence cannot be backported to stable branches. > > > > Fixes: 38c9817ee1d8 ("mempool: adjust name size in related data > > types") > > Cc: [email protected] > > > > Signed-off-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <[email protected]> > > --- > > lib/ring/rte_ring_core.h | 7 +------ > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/lib/ring/rte_ring_core.h b/lib/ring/rte_ring_core.h index > > 31f7200fa9..46ad584f9c 100644 > > --- a/lib/ring/rte_ring_core.h > > +++ b/lib/ring/rte_ring_core.h > > @@ -118,12 +118,7 @@ struct rte_ring_hts_headtail { > > * a problem. > > */ > > struct rte_ring { > > - /* > > - * Note: this field kept the RTE_MEMZONE_NAMESIZE size due to ABI > > - * compatibility requirements, it could be changed to > > RTE_RING_NAMESIZE > > - * next time the ABI changes > > - */ > > - char name[RTE_MEMZONE_NAMESIZE] __rte_cache_aligned; > > + char name[RTE_RING_NAMESIZE] __rte_cache_aligned; > > /**< Name of the ring. */ > > int flags; /**< Flags supplied at creation. */ > > const struct rte_memzone *memzone; > > -- > > 2.25.1
