> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mcnamara, John <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thursday, December 2, 2021 8:45 AM
> To: Brandon Lo <[email protected]>; Zhang, Roy Fan <[email protected]>
> Cc: dev <[email protected]>; Kovacevic, Marko <[email protected]>
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] Question Regarding FIPS Validation in DPDK
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: dev <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Brandon Lo
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 3, 2021 5:45 PM
> > To: Kovacevic, Marko <[email protected]>
> > Cc: dev <[email protected]>
> > Subject: [dpdk-dev] Question Regarding FIPS Validation in DPDK
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have been able to use Cisco's libacvp tool to retrieve test vectors
> > from the NIST ACVP API.
> > However, after building the dpdk-fips_validation example and reading
> > through its documentation, it seems like the example application is
> > unable to parse the request files due to them being in a different
> format.
> > Currently, the ACVP API will supply request files in json format.
> >
> > The example app documentation says that the request file must be in
> > CAVS
> > 21.0 format. I have not been able to find a specification for this
> > format to compare.
> > Does the current version of the dpdk-fips_validation example support
> > the API's test vectors in json format?
> 
> 
> At the time the dpdk-fips_validation tool was written the test vectors
> weren't available in JSON format, and, to the best of my knowledge, there
> was a format specification (which is why there is different parsing for
> different algorithms). We (the community) should probably move to the JSON
> format. Adding Fan Zhang since I think this was discussion in the
> community previously.

Sorry I meant to say " to the best of my knowledge, there *wasn't* a format 
specification" available.

John

Reply via email to