On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 8:06 AM Jiang, YuX <[email protected]> wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jiang, YuX > > Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2021 7:04 PM > > To: Jiang, YuX <[email protected]>; [email protected]; > > [email protected] > > Cc: [email protected]; Abhishek Marathe <[email protected]>; > > Akhil Goyal <[email protected]>; Ali Alnubani <[email protected]>; > > Walker, Benjamin <[email protected]>; David Christensen > > <[email protected]>; Govindharajan, Hariprasad > > <[email protected]>; Hemant Agrawal > > <[email protected]>; Stokes, Ian <[email protected]>; Jerin > > Jacob <[email protected]>; Mcnamara, John <[email protected]>; > > Ju-Hyoung Lee <[email protected]>; Kevin Traynor > > <[email protected]>; Luca Boccassi <[email protected]>; Pei Zhang > > <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Xu, Qian Q > > <[email protected]>; Raslan Darawsheh <[email protected]>; Thomas > > Monjalon <[email protected]>; Peng, Yuan <[email protected]>; > > Chen, Zhaoyan <[email protected]> > > Subject: RE: 19.11.11 patches review and test > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Jiang, YuX <[email protected]> > > > Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2021 3:14 PM > > > To: [email protected]; [email protected] > > > Cc: [email protected]; Abhishek Marathe > > <[email protected]>; > > > Akhil Goyal <[email protected]>; Ali Alnubani <[email protected]>; > > > Walker, Benjamin <[email protected]>; David Christensen > > > <[email protected]>; Govindharajan, Hariprasad > > > <[email protected]>; Hemant Agrawal > > > <[email protected]>; Stokes, Ian <[email protected]>; Jerin > > > Jacob <[email protected]>; Mcnamara, John > > <[email protected]>; > > > Ju-Hyoung Lee <[email protected]>; Kevin Traynor > > > <[email protected]>; Luca Boccassi <[email protected]>; Pei Zhang > > > <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Xu, Qian Q > > > <[email protected]>; Raslan Darawsheh <[email protected]>; Thomas > > > Monjalon <[email protected]>; Peng, Yuan <[email protected]>; > > > Chen, Zhaoyan <[email protected]> > > > Subject: RE: 19.11.11 patches review and test > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: [email protected] > > > > <[email protected]> > > > > Sent: Thursday, December 9, 2021 10:43 PM > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > Cc: [email protected]; Abhishek Marathe > > > <[email protected]>; > > > > Akhil Goyal <[email protected]>; Ali Alnubani > > > > <[email protected]>; Walker, Benjamin <[email protected]>; > > > > David Christensen <[email protected]>; Govindharajan, > > > > Hariprasad <[email protected]>; Hemant Agrawal > > > > <[email protected]>; Stokes, Ian <[email protected]>; Jerin > > > > Jacob <[email protected]>; Mcnamara, John > > > <[email protected]>; > > > > Ju-Hyoung Lee <[email protected]>; Kevin Traynor > > > > <[email protected]>; Luca Boccassi <[email protected]>; Pei Zhang > > > > <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Xu, Qian Q > > > > <[email protected]>; Raslan Darawsheh <[email protected]>; > > Thomas > > > > Monjalon <[email protected]>; Peng, Yuan > > <[email protected]>; > > > > Chen, Zhaoyan <[email protected]> > > > > Subject: 19.11.11 patches review and test > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > Here is a list of patches targeted for stable release 19.11.11. > > > > > > > > The planned date for the final release is 7th January 2021. > > > > > > > > Please help with testing and validation of your use cases and report > > > > any issues/results with reply-all to this mail. For the final > > > > release the fixes and reported validations will be added to the release > > notes. > > > > > > > > A release candidate tarball can be found at: > > > > > > > > https://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/tag/?id=v19.11.11-rc1 > > > > > > > > These patches are located at branch 19.11 of dpdk-stable repo: > > > > https://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/ > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > Christian Ehrhardt <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > --- > > > Hi Christian, > > > > > > We find many build issues on LTS19.11. But all of them have no fix yet. > > > https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=744 DPDK core dev UNCO > > > --- [dpdk-19.11.9-rc3] make build failed on Fedora34 with GCC11 > > > and build failed on Fedora35 with gcc11.2.1&clang13.0.0 > > > https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=747 DPDK core dev UNCO > > > --- [dpdk-19.11.9-rc3] Meson build failed with ICC-19.1.1 > > > https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=900 DPDK ethdev dev UNCO > > > --- [19.11.11-rc1] net/nfp build failure with clang 13 > > > https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=901 DPDK ethdev dev UNCO > > > --- [19.11.11-rc1] net/i40e build failure with make and clang 13 > > > https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=902 DPDK ethdev dev UNCO > > > --- [19.11.11-rc1] net/ice build failure with make and clang 13 > > > https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=903 DPDK ethdev dev UNCO > > > --- [19.11.11-rc1] net/ixgbe build failure with make and clang 13 > > > https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=904 DPDK meson dev UNCO > > > --- [dpdk-19.11.11] Meson build has some failures on Fedora35 > > > with clang 13.0.0 > > > https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=905 DPDK meson dev UNCO > > > --- [dpdk-19.11.11-rc1]Meson&Makefile build failed on > > > Freebsd13 with gcc10.3.0&clang11.0.1 > > > > Update the test status for Intel part. Till now dpdk19.11.11-rc1 test is > > almost > > finished. > > Totally find three bugs for Build test from Intel. > > # Basic Intel(R) NIC testing > > * Build: cover the build test combination with latest GCC/Clang/ICC version > > and the popular OS revision such as Ubuntu20.04, Fedora34, RHEL8.4, etc. > > - All test done. > > - Tree bugs are found. > > https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=904 > > https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=905 > > dpdk-19.11.11-rc]KNI build failed used makefile on OpenSuse15.3 with > > gcc7.5.0&clang11.0.1, has fix. > > * PF(i40e, ixgbe): test scenarios including > > RTE_FLOW/TSO/Jumboframe/checksum offload/VLAN/VXLAN, etc. > > - All test done. No new issue is found. > > * VF(i40e, ixgbe): test scenarios including VF- > > RTE_FLOW/TSO/Jumboframe/checksum offload/VLAN/VXLAN, etc. > > > > - All test done. No new issue is found. > > * PF/VF(ice): test scenarios including Switch features/Package > > Management/Flow Director/Advanced Tx, etc. > > - All test done. No new issue is found. > > * Intel NIC single core/NIC performance: test scenarios including PF/VF > > single > > core performance test etc. > > - All test done. No big performance drop. > > * IPsec: test scenarios including ipsec/ipsec-gw/ipsec library basic test - > > QAT&SW/FIB library, etc. > > - All passed. > > # Basic cryptodev and virtio testing > > * Virtio: both function and performance test are covered. Such as > > PVP/Virtio_loopback/virtio-user loopback/virtio-net VM2VM perf testing, > > etc. > > - All test done. No new issue is found. > > * Cryptodev: > > * Function test: test scenarios including Cryptodev API testing/CompressDev > > ISA-L/QAT/ZLIB PMD Testing/ etc. > > - All test done. > > * Performance test: test scenarios including Thoughput Performance > > /Cryptodev Latency, etc. > > - All test done. > Verify bugs: 901/902/903 > https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=901 [19.11.11-rc1] net/i40e build > failure with make and clang 13 > https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=902 [19.11.11-rc1] net/ice build > failure with make and clang 13 > https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=903 [19.11.11-rc1] net/ixgbe build > failure with make and clang 13
Thank you, they also work well in all my tests so far. > Verified patchset https://github.com/cpaelzer/dpdk-stable-queue/commits/19.11/ > Commit: > net/ixgbe: build failure with make and clang 13 > acd0a2d2d net/ice: build failure with make and clang 13 > cc089e955 net/i40e: build failure with make and clang 13 > > Tested with clang version 13.0.0 (Fedora 13.0.0~rc1-1.fc35) on baseline > 19.11.11-rc1, > No ice/i40e/ixgbe error. > Find two new bugs: > https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=911 [19.11.11-rc1] > linux/igb_uio/igb_uio build failure with make and clang 13 > https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=912 [19.11.11-rc1] net/qede build > failure with make and clang 13 Thanks for finding and filing these. 911 is a dup of 907, but 912 seems legit. -- Christian Ehrhardt Staff Engineer, Ubuntu Server Canonical Ltd
