> -----Original Message----- > From: Neil Horman [mailto:nhorman at tuxdriver.com] > Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 7:16 PM > To: Mcnamara, John > Cc: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: additional parameter in RX > callback > > > Well, we're well past the new feature phase of this cycle, so I would say > NACK.
Hi Neil, This is more of a bug fix than a feature request. In retrospect it was a mistake not to have the same function declaration in the callbacks as in the rte_eth_XX_burst functions since it was likely that the callbacks would need access to the same information. This patch is trying to fix that error before it is set in stone. John
