> > Hi, > > Please see my comments inline. > > Thanks, > Xuelin > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Ananyev, Konstantin [mailto:konstantin.ananyev at intel.com] > > Sent: Friday, March 27, 2015 09:04 > > To: Shi Xuelin-B29237; thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com > > Cc: dev at dpdk.org > > Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] ixgbe: fix ixgbe access endian issue > > on bigendian arch > > > > Hi, > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of > > > xuelin.shi at freescale.com > > > Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2015 6:34 AM > > > To: thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com > > > Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Xuelin Shi > > > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] ixgbe: fix ixgbe access endian issue on > > > bigendian arch > > > > > > From: Xuelin Shi <xuelin.shi at freescale.com> > > > > > > enforce rules of the cpu and ixgbe exchange data. > > > 1. cpu use data owned by ixgbe must use rte_le_to_cpu_xx(...) 2. cpu > > > fill data to ixgbe must use rte_cpu_to_le_xx(...) > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Xuelin Shi <xuelin.shi at freescale.com> > > > --- > > > changes for v2: > > > rebased on latest head. > > > fix some style issue detected by checkpatch.pl > > > > > > lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c | 104 > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- > > > 1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c > > > b/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c > > > index 9da2c7e..961ac08 100644 > > > --- a/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c > > > +++ b/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c > > > @@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ ixgbe_tx_free_bufs(struct ixgbe_tx_queue *txq) > > > int i; > > > > > > /* check DD bit on threshold descriptor */ > > > - status = txq->tx_ring[txq->tx_next_dd].wb.status; > > > + status = rte_le_to_cpu_32(txq->tx_ring[txq->tx_next_dd].wb.status); > > > if (! (status & IXGBE_ADVTXD_STAT_DD)) > > > return 0; > > > > > > @@ -174,11 +174,14 @@ tx4(volatile union ixgbe_adv_tx_desc *txdp, > > struct rte_mbuf **pkts) > > > pkt_len = (*pkts)->data_len; > > > > > > /* write data to descriptor */ > > > - txdp->read.buffer_addr = buf_dma_addr; > > > + txdp->read.buffer_addr = rte_cpu_to_le_64(buf_dma_addr); > > > + > > > txdp->read.cmd_type_len = > > > - ((uint32_t)DCMD_DTYP_FLAGS | pkt_len); > > > + rte_cpu_to_le_32((uint32_t)DCMD_DTYP_FLAGS | pkt_len); > > > + > > > txdp->read.olinfo_status = > > > - (pkt_len << IXGBE_ADVTXD_PAYLEN_SHIFT); > > > + rte_cpu_to_le_32(pkt_len << IXGBE_ADVTXD_PAYLEN_SHIFT); > > > + > > > rte_prefetch0(&(*pkts)->pool); > > > } > > > } > > > @@ -194,11 +197,14 @@ tx1(volatile union ixgbe_adv_tx_desc *txdp, > > struct rte_mbuf **pkts) > > > pkt_len = (*pkts)->data_len; > > > > > > /* write data to descriptor */ > > > - txdp->read.buffer_addr = buf_dma_addr; > > > + txdp->read.buffer_addr = rte_cpu_to_le_64(buf_dma_addr); > > > + > > > txdp->read.cmd_type_len = > > > - ((uint32_t)DCMD_DTYP_FLAGS | pkt_len); > > > + rte_cpu_to_le_32((uint32_t)DCMD_DTYP_FLAGS | pkt_len); > > > + > > > txdp->read.olinfo_status = > > > - (pkt_len << IXGBE_ADVTXD_PAYLEN_SHIFT); > > > + rte_cpu_to_le_32(pkt_len << IXGBE_ADVTXD_PAYLEN_SHIFT); > > > + > > > rte_prefetch0(&(*pkts)->pool); > > > } > > > > > > @@ -285,7 +291,7 @@ tx_xmit_pkts(void *tx_queue, struct rte_mbuf > > **tx_pkts, > > > * a divisor of the ring size > > > */ > > > tx_r[txq->tx_next_rs].read.cmd_type_len |= > > > - rte_cpu_to_le_32(IXGBE_ADVTXD_DCMD_RS); > > > + rte_cpu_to_le_32(IXGBE_ADVTXD_DCMD_RS); > > > txq->tx_next_rs = (uint16_t)(txq->tx_rs_thresh - 1); > > > > > > txq->tx_tail = 0; > > > @@ -304,7 +310,7 @@ tx_xmit_pkts(void *tx_queue, struct rte_mbuf > > **tx_pkts, > > > */ > > > if (txq->tx_tail > txq->tx_next_rs) { > > > tx_r[txq->tx_next_rs].read.cmd_type_len |= > > > - rte_cpu_to_le_32(IXGBE_ADVTXD_DCMD_RS); > > > + rte_cpu_to_le_32(IXGBE_ADVTXD_DCMD_RS); > > > txq->tx_next_rs = (uint16_t)(txq->tx_next_rs + > > > txq->tx_rs_thresh); > > > if (txq->tx_next_rs >= txq->nb_tx_desc) @@ -505,6 +511,7 @@ > > > ixgbe_xmit_cleanup(struct ixgbe_tx_queue *txq) > > > uint16_t nb_tx_desc = txq->nb_tx_desc; > > > uint16_t desc_to_clean_to; > > > uint16_t nb_tx_to_clean; > > > + uint32_t stat; > > > > > > /* Determine the last descriptor needing to be cleaned */ > > > desc_to_clean_to = (uint16_t)(last_desc_cleaned + > > > txq->tx_rs_thresh); @@ -513,7 +520,9 @@ ixgbe_xmit_cleanup(struct > > > ixgbe_tx_queue *txq) > > > > > > /* Check to make sure the last descriptor to clean is done */ > > > desc_to_clean_to = sw_ring[desc_to_clean_to].last_id; > > > - if (! (txr[desc_to_clean_to].wb.status & IXGBE_TXD_STAT_DD)) > > > + > > > + stat = rte_le_to_cpu_32(txr[desc_to_clean_to].wb.status); > > > + if (!(stat & IXGBE_TXD_STAT_DD)) > > > { > > > PMD_TX_FREE_LOG(DEBUG, > > > "TX descriptor %4u is not done" > > > @@ -544,7 +553,7 @@ ixgbe_xmit_cleanup(struct ixgbe_tx_queue *txq) > > > * up to the last descriptor with the RS bit set > > > * are done. Only reset the threshold descriptor. > > > */ > > > - txr[desc_to_clean_to].wb.status = 0; > > > + txr[desc_to_clean_to].wb.status = rte_cpu_to_le_32(0); > > > > Don't think you need swap bytes here. > > Yes, it's to accentuate the endian rule. I'm expecting compiler will > optimizing it.
It probably would, though still don't see any reason for doing it. > > > > > > > > > /* Update the txq to reflect the last descriptor that was cleaned > > */ > > > txq->last_desc_cleaned = desc_to_clean_to; @@ -801,12 +810,14 @@ > > > ixgbe_xmit_pkts(void *tx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **tx_pkts, > > > */ > > > slen = m_seg->data_len; > > > buf_dma_addr = RTE_MBUF_DATA_DMA_ADDR(m_seg); > > > + > > > txd->read.buffer_addr = > > > - rte_cpu_to_le_64(buf_dma_addr); > > > + rte_cpu_to_le_64(buf_dma_addr); > > > txd->read.cmd_type_len = > > > - rte_cpu_to_le_32(cmd_type_len | slen); > > > + rte_cpu_to_le_32(cmd_type_len | slen); > > > txd->read.olinfo_status = > > > - rte_cpu_to_le_32(olinfo_status); > > > + rte_cpu_to_le_32(olinfo_status); > > > + > > > txe->last_id = tx_last; > > > tx_id = txe->next_id; > > > txe = txn; > > > @@ -946,14 +957,16 @@ ixgbe_rx_scan_hw_ring(struct ixgbe_rx_queue *rxq) > > > uint64_t pkt_flags; > > > int s[LOOK_AHEAD], nb_dd; > > > int i, j, nb_rx = 0; > > > + uint32_t stat; > > > > > > > > > /* get references to current descriptor and S/W ring entry */ > > > rxdp = &rxq->rx_ring[rxq->rx_tail]; > > > rxep = &rxq->sw_ring[rxq->rx_tail]; > > > > > > + stat = rte_le_to_cpu_32(rxdp->wb.upper.status_error); > > > /* check to make sure there is at least 1 packet to receive */ > > > - if (! (rxdp->wb.upper.status_error & IXGBE_RXDADV_STAT_DD)) > > > + if (!(stat & IXGBE_RXDADV_STAT_DD)) > > > return 0; > > > > > > /* > > > @@ -965,7 +978,7 @@ ixgbe_rx_scan_hw_ring(struct ixgbe_rx_queue *rxq) > > > { > > > /* Read desc statuses backwards to avoid race condition */ > > > for (j = LOOK_AHEAD-1; j >= 0; --j) > > > - s[j] = rxdp[j].wb.upper.status_error; > > > + s[j] = rte_le_to_cpu_32(rxdp[j].wb.upper.status_error); > > > > > > /* Compute how many status bits were set */ > > > nb_dd = 0; > > > @@ -976,28 +989,36 @@ ixgbe_rx_scan_hw_ring(struct ixgbe_rx_queue > > > *rxq) > > > > > > /* Translate descriptor info to mbuf format */ > > > for (j = 0; j < nb_dd; ++j) { > > > + uint16_t tmp16; > > > + uint32_t tmp32; > > > + > > > mb = rxep[j].mbuf; > > > - pkt_len = (uint16_t)(rxdp[j].wb.upper.length - rxq- > > >crc_len); > > > + tmp16 = rte_le_to_cpu_16(rxdp[j].wb.upper.length); > > > + pkt_len = tmp16 - rxq->crc_len; > > > > Here and in other places, wonder why do you introduce temporary variables? > > Why not just: > > pkt_len = rte_le_to_cpu_16( (rxdp[j].wb.upper.length) - rxq->crc_len; ? > > Comply with 80 char width limit style Ok, but what prevents you from: pkt_len = rte_le_to_cpu_16( (rxdp[j].wb.upper.length) - rxq->crc_len; ? BTW, Nice to see that people try to follow 80-char rule :) > > > > > > mb->data_len = pkt_len; > > > mb->pkt_len = pkt_len; > > > - mb->vlan_tci = rxdp[j].wb.upper.vlan; > > > mb->vlan_tci = rte_le_to_cpu_16(rxdp[j].wb.upper.vlan); > > > > > > /* convert descriptor fields to rte mbuf flags */ > > > - pkt_flags = rx_desc_hlen_type_rss_to_pkt_flags( > > > + tmp32 = rte_le_to_cpu_32( > > > rxdp[j].wb.lower.lo_dword.data); > > > > > > Same here, why just not: > > pkt_flags = > > rx_desc_hlen_type_rss_to_pkt_flags(rte_le_to_cpu_32(rxdp[j].wb.lower.lo_d > > word.data)); > > ? > > > > > + pkt_flags = rx_desc_hlen_type_rss_to_pkt_flags(tmp32); > > > + > > > /* reuse status field from scan list */ > > > pkt_flags |= rx_desc_status_to_pkt_flags(s[j]); > > > pkt_flags |= rx_desc_error_to_pkt_flags(s[j]); > > > mb->ol_flags = pkt_flags; > > > > > > if (likely(pkt_flags & PKT_RX_RSS_HASH)) > > > - mb->hash.rss = rxdp[j].wb.lower.hi_dword.rss; > > > + mb->hash.rss = rte_le_to_cpu_32( > > > + rxdp[j].wb.lower.hi_dword.rss); > > > else if (pkt_flags & PKT_RX_FDIR) { > > > - mb->hash.fdir.hash = > > > - > > (uint16_t)((rxdp[j].wb.lower.hi_dword.csum_ip.csum) > > > - & IXGBE_ATR_HASH_MASK); > > > - mb->hash.fdir.id = > > rxdp[j].wb.lower.hi_dword.csum_ip.ip_id; > > > + tmp16 = rxdp[j].wb.lower.hi_dword.csum_ip.csum; > > > + mb->hash.fdir.hash = rte_le_to_cpu_16( > > > + tmp16 & IXGBE_ATR_HASH_MASK); > > > > Shouldn't it be: > > rte_le_to_cpu_16(tmp16) & IXGBE_ATR_HASH_MASK; ? > > Because the value of IXGBE_ATR_HASH_MASK is assumed as little endian. Didn't get you here, IXGBE_ATR_HASH_MASK is just a constant value: lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe/ixgbe_type.h:3059:#define IXGBE_ATR_HASH_MASK 0x7fff How it could be 'assumed as little endian'? > > > > > > + > > > + tmp16 = rxdp[j].wb.lower.hi_dword.csum_ip.ip_id; > > > + mb->hash.fdir.id = rte_le_to_cpu_16(tmp16); > > > } > > > } > > > > > > @@ -1051,8 +1072,8 @@ ixgbe_rx_alloc_bufs(struct ixgbe_rx_queue *rxq) > > > > > > /* populate the descriptors */ > > > dma_addr = > > rte_cpu_to_le_64(RTE_MBUF_DATA_DMA_ADDR_DEFAULT(mb)); > > > - rxdp[i].read.hdr_addr = dma_addr; > > > - rxdp[i].read.pkt_addr = dma_addr; > > > + rxdp[i].read.hdr_addr = rte_cpu_to_le_64(dma_addr); > > > + rxdp[i].read.pkt_addr = rte_cpu_to_le_64(dma_addr); > > > > No need these 2 swaps here. > > dma_addr already converted to LE, just a line above. > > OK, these two should be removed. > > > > > > } > > > > > > /* update tail pointer */ > > > @@ -1220,8 +1241,8 @@ ixgbe_recv_pkts(void *rx_queue, struct rte_mbuf > > **rx_pkts, > > > * using invalid descriptor fields when read from rxd. > > > */ > > > rxdp = &rx_ring[rx_id]; > > > - staterr = rxdp->wb.upper.status_error; > > > - if (! (staterr & rte_cpu_to_le_32(IXGBE_RXDADV_STAT_DD))) > > > + staterr = rte_le_to_cpu_32(rxdp->wb.upper.status_error); > > > + if (!(staterr & IXGBE_RXDADV_STAT_DD)) > > > > Why do you need that change here? > > Original code seems also ok to me. > > I think it is more clear. We read some value from PCIe and change it to cpu > format. > I accentuate the rules of read/write between cpu and PCIe. It is probably a bit clearer, but from other side it seems a bit slower. As you pointed above, rte_constant_bswap32(constant_value) will most likely be optimized by the compiler, so no real byte swap would happen here. > > > > > > > > break; > > > rxd = *rxdp; > > > > > > @@ -1325,12 +1346,17 @@ ixgbe_recv_pkts(void *rx_queue, struct rte_mbuf > > **rx_pkts, > > > rxm->ol_flags = pkt_flags; > > > > > > if (likely(pkt_flags & PKT_RX_RSS_HASH)) > > > - rxm->hash.rss = rxd.wb.lower.hi_dword.rss; > > > + rxm->hash.rss = rte_le_to_cpu_32( > > > + rxd.wb.lower.hi_dword.rss); > > > else if (pkt_flags & PKT_RX_FDIR) { > > > - rxm->hash.fdir.hash = > > > - (uint16_t)((rxd.wb.lower.hi_dword.csum_ip.csum) > > > - & IXGBE_ATR_HASH_MASK); > > > - rxm->hash.fdir.id = rxd.wb.lower.hi_dword.csum_ip.ip_id; > > > + uint16_t tmp16; > > > + > > > + tmp16 = rxd.wb.lower.hi_dword.csum_ip.csum; > > > + rxm->hash.fdir.hash = rte_le_to_cpu_16( > > > + tmp16 & IXGBE_ATR_HASH_MASK); > > > > > > Same thing here, seems should be: rte_le_to_cpu_16(tmp16) & > > IXGBE_ATR_HASH_MASK; > > > > > + > > > + rxm->hash.fdir.id = rte_le_to_cpu_16( > > > + rxd.wb.lower.hi_dword.csum_ip.ip_id); > > > } > > > /* > > > * Store the mbuf address into the next entry of the array @@ > > > -1412,8 +1438,8 @@ ixgbe_recv_scattered_pkts(void *rx_queue, struct > > rte_mbuf **rx_pkts, > > > * using invalid descriptor fields when read from rxd. > > > */ > > > rxdp = &rx_ring[rx_id]; > > > - staterr = rxdp->wb.upper.status_error; > > > - if (! (staterr & rte_cpu_to_le_32(IXGBE_RXDADV_STAT_DD))) > > > + staterr = rte_cpu_to_le_32(rxdp->wb.upper.status_error); > > > + if (!(staterr & IXGBE_RXDADV_STAT_DD)) > > > > > > Again, seems unnecessary. > > > > > break; > > > rxd = *rxdp; > > > > > > @@ -1742,7 +1768,7 @@ ixgbe_reset_tx_queue(struct ixgbe_tx_queue *txq) > > > prev = (uint16_t) (txq->nb_tx_desc - 1); > > > for (i = 0; i < txq->nb_tx_desc; i++) { > > > volatile union ixgbe_adv_tx_desc *txd = &txq->tx_ring[i]; > > > - txd->wb.status = IXGBE_TXD_STAT_DD; > > > + txd->wb.status = rte_cpu_to_le_32(IXGBE_TXD_STAT_DD); > > > txe[i].mbuf = NULL; > > > txe[i].last_id = i; > > > txe[prev].next_id = i; > > > @@ -2293,7 +2319,8 @@ ixgbe_dev_rx_queue_count(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, > > uint16_t rx_queue_id) > > > rxdp = &(rxq->rx_ring[rxq->rx_tail]); > > > > > > while ((desc < rxq->nb_rx_desc) && > > > - (rxdp->wb.upper.status_error & IXGBE_RXDADV_STAT_DD)) { > > > + (rte_le_to_cpu_32(rxdp->wb.upper.status_error) & > > > + IXGBE_RXDADV_STAT_DD)) { > > > desc += IXGBE_RXQ_SCAN_INTERVAL; > > > rxdp += IXGBE_RXQ_SCAN_INTERVAL; > > > if (rxq->rx_tail + desc >= rxq->nb_rx_desc) @@ -2318,7 > > +2345,8 @@ > > > ixgbe_dev_rx_descriptor_done(void *rx_queue, uint16_t offset) > > > desc -= rxq->nb_rx_desc; > > > > > > rxdp = &rxq->rx_ring[desc]; > > > - return !!(rxdp->wb.upper.status_error & IXGBE_RXDADV_STAT_DD); > > > + return !!(rte_le_to_cpu_32(rxdp->wb.upper.status_error) & > > > + IXGBE_RXDADV_STAT_DD); > > > } > > > > > > void > > > -- > > > 1.9.1