On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 17:39:06 +0000 Don Provan <dprovan at bivio.net> wrote:
> In all the debate about atomics, I don't think anyone got around to pointing > out that in the unlikely case that the refcnt is not 1, then it's equally > unlikely that decrementing it will result in 0 despite the code's claim to > the contrary. That's the part that confused me. Would it make sense to fix > this while adding the comment? Really doubt the second likely() makes any difference in code speed. Should probably just be removed.
