> -----Original Message----- > From: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.v.anan...@yandex.ru> > Sent: Sunday, 15 May 2022 23:54 > To: Ido Goshen <i...@cgstowernetworks.com>; Ananyev, Konstantin > <konstantin.anan...@intel.com>; us...@dpdk.org; dev@dpdk.org > Subject: Re: Does ACL support field size of 8 bytes? > > > My concern was it is sort of awkward in terms of input_field value for rules > with > 8B long.
[idog] I'm always puzzled with the input_index field. I just randomly group the small size fields (u8, u16) without any applicative meaning. Feels like it's redundant in the API an can be done internally by the lib like you do now for u64 (though it'll be less trivial to do)
