On 5/2/2015 1:19 AM, Aaro Koskinen wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 12:45:12PM -0400, Neil Horman wrote: >>> - GitHub manages the patches via pull requests and can be easily seen >>> via a web browser. >>> - The down side is you do have to use a web browser to do some work, but >>> the bulk of the everyday work would be done as it is today. >>> - I think we all have a web browser now :-) >> Yes, but as you said above, using a web browser doesn't make reviewing >> patches >> faster. In fact, I would assert that it slows the process down, as it >> prevents quick, easy command line access to patch review (as you have with a >> properly configured MUA). That seems like we're going in the opposite >> direction of at least one problem we would like to solve. > I agree. Having a web browser interface for reviews etc. is acceptable > only if people can still continue to use e-mail if they prefer. > I don't know how github works in this regard but patches should still > appear on the mailing list and it should be still possible to comment > them via mailing list.
How it comes? As I know if use github, the maillist will be meaningless. And do you know some area on the earth maybe have issue with github? Anyway, Github is OK to me, but I prefer maillist :). Thanks, Michael > A. >